From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76405 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: pmlists@free.fr (Peter =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCnster?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Position of point in reply-with-original Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:43:39 +0100 Organization: Micropit Message-ID: <87vd0yb72s.fsf@micropit.couberia.bzh> References: <87tyglxjja.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5bpgk6p.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87k4hhniw6.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipx1yqhz.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87pqr8946o.fsf@gmail.com> <87pqr8py5g.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87ipx07nws.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3n8loqz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vd10kx1a.fsf@gnus.org> <871v3nirme.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296935094 1289 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2011 19:44:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 19:44:54 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24753@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Feb 05 20:44:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Plo3s-0003sB-TH for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:44:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Plo3E-0003y2-35; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 13:44:08 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Plo3B-0003xq-JC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 13:44:05 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Plo31-0001bG-9P for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 13:44:05 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Plo2z-0002ee-0L for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:43:53 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Plo2y-0003Is-Qy for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:43:52 +0100 Original-Received: from arennes-555-1-16-189.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr ([86.203.83.189]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:43:52 +0100 Original-Received: from pmlists by arennes-555-1-16-189.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:43:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: arennes-555-1-16-189.w86-203.abo.wanadoo.fr User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZaBLROBgH60jpjpx8+YcACcdpsU= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76405 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > My concern is really about aesthetics and communication. I hate my > messages to be mangled by Outlook and misinterpreted more than I hate > top-posting. That means, that Outlook renders interleaved postings quite differently than the MUAs that I know. I'll take a look at this strange software at the next opportunity... So excuse me please: I thought, that the only reason for you to top-post was "Because all the other people at work do it that way." ... ;) (That's exactly the argument, that always bugs me.) -- Peter