From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74349 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz?= Stelmach Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [BUG] yanking base64 encoded e-mail is a fail Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:02:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87vd3mba16.fsf@kotik.lan> References: <8739qrlkjq.fsf@kotik.lan> <87zksy4gbc.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290639761 27250 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2010 23:02:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:02:41 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22714@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Nov 25 00:02:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLOMG-0000TN-AX for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:02:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PLOME-0004Fj-31; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:02:34 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PLOMC-0004FX-Tr for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:02:32 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLOM8-0002L4-Rd for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:02:32 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PLOM8-0004zC-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:02:28 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLOM7-0000Ph-Dr for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:02:27 +0100 Original-Received: from 87-205-242-8.adsl.inetia.pl ([87.205.242.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:02:27 +0100 Original-Received: from lukasz.stelmach by 87-205-242-8.adsl.inetia.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:02:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 26 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 87-205-242-8.adsl.inetia.pl User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8zCnhCDhQHqTi0P6Ay1YoXC8ZI4= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74349 Archived-At: <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Julien Danjou writes: > >> I've re-reverted with a fix. Does this seems good to you? > > It should really return the point where the body starts, which it does > now, but, on the other hand, if you have a <#secure thing in there, > it'll return a different value from where it's putting point, so it > seems inconsistent... IMHO if it makes any difference whether message-goto-body returns point right after mail-header-separator or after <#secure then there is something wrong. My mistake was not to return the point from the mssage-goto-body at all. Take a look at <87wro2babo.fsf@kotik.lan>, I think there is a fix. > I'm not sure what the <#secure thing is trying to fix, but I think it > sounds like that is being done in the wrong place, perhaps. OK, so I made a mess. -- Miłego dnia, Łukasz Stelmach