From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72357 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Any juicy outstanding Gnus bugs? Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:34:59 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87vd5m530c.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87fwww1bht.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871v8cxud8.fsf@jumptrading.com> <87ocbgwc8u.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87iq1n8dtk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4m3i19x.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ocbfaw0t.fsf@uwo.ca> <87k4m359kz.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878w2j57c1.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285882551 19194 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2010 21:35:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:35:51 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20730@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 30 23:35:50 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Qn7-0005iK-O2 for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:35:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Qmj-0007nc-1Z; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:35:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Qmg-0007nN-P5 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:35:22 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P1Qmc-0004j2-KJ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:35:22 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P1Qmb-0005VL-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:35:17 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1QmZ-0005XX-Df for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:35:15 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:35:15 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:35:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fgS/9AvmHZXVo4SWoBkgtx6mnc8= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72357 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:10:57 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> That will certainly work for now. But since we seem to be OK with >> rethinking how splitting works, can we consider merging normal and fancy >> splitting? It's pretty easy to tell the two formats apart and it would >> simplify the splitting logic and the manual. LMI> I think I dimly remember there being some reason why this is split into LMI> two methods no, but I can't really remember why. No idea here. Maybe an old-timer can remember :) LMI> It does seem that the syntaxes (syntaxii? syntices?) are sufficiently LMI> different to tell them apart... Yeah, basically if the ruleset is a list and the first list element is a list of two strings, it's a standard split ruleset (fancy rules always have three string elements or other contents). Otherwise it's a fancy ruleset. In untested form, given `ruleset': (and (listp ruleset) (let ((top-element (car-safe ruleset))) (and (= 2 (length top-element)) (stringp (nth 0 top-element)) (stringp (nth 1 top-element))))) Ted