From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72334 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: slow nnimap moves due do many SELECTs Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:11:08 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87vd5nyudf.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87lj6tg8sc.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sk11n1rg.fsf@maru.md5i.com> <87k4mdmzsg.fsf@maru.md5i.com> <87wrq6hu71.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87y6aj6xjq.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285870303 21807 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2010 18:11:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:11:43 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20707@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 30 20:11:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1NbZ-0001Dy-AT for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:11:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1NbQ-0005rY-7C; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:11:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P1NbO-0005rJ-DT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P1NbK-0000Ul-AG for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:11:30 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P1NbJ-0002Tf-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:11:25 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1NbF-00014A-10 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:11:21 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:11:21 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:11:21 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ik3uybXNlZ/0bsV76O9IQYoMCvY= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72334 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:43:31 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> I'm leaning towards 2)... LMI> Or option pi), which I've now implemented: Use EXAMINE instead of LMI> SELECT. On some servers EXAMINE is a lot faster. Could you try it and LMI> see whether this helps at all? Yes, that's a bit faster. SELECT does a lot more so that makes sense; is there any downside to EXAMINE? On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:02:48 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Why not use the LAST parameter to nnimap-request-move-article to >> trigger the group update? It's only set for the last article in the >> list AFAICT. LMI> I don't really want to rewrite all the backend -move and -accept LMI> methods. There must be at least ten of them... I don't understand. The LAST parameter is already there and given to you by Gnus (it's t only for the last article) when the user runs `B m', right? Ted