From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71982 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nils Ackermann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Any juicy outstanding Gnus bugs? Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:38:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87vd5r5egl.fsf@thysbe.fqdn.ackermath.info> References: <877hi9z277.fsf@thysbe.fqdn.ackermath.info> <87y6apxm8x.fsf@thysbe.fqdn.ackermath.info> <87hbhc9x64.fsf@thysbe.fqdn.ackermath.info> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285605565 21867 80.91.229.12 (27 Sep 2010 16:39:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:39:25 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20355@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Sep 27 18:39:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Gja-0005Ry-EL for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:39:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P0GjY-0001Hj-2R; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:39:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P0GjW-0001HQ-6w for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:39:18 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0GjS-0006RD-3Y for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:39:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P0GjM-0005EB-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:39:08 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 19095 invoked by uid 1003); 27 Sep 2010 16:38:37 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ackermath.info; b=lRU4fPjFKOO/oSvKRThtoDPbxY6MqVPuple2sLCCBgF4TkmlsJ0hvP4KhXbtElVjuSDQCEhsjS5Val5DG/knleaEDbBkirzTyxZjkYUwWyaOHOGtzfebe5VuLQ5WToBB ; Original-Received: from dsl-201-124-5-140-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx (HELO thysbe.localdomain) (nils@nieback.info@201.124.5.140) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 27 Sep 2010 16:38:36 -0000 Original-Received: by thysbe.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26560E5A3E; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:38:34 -0500 (CDT) Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:50:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-829--1530h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-723--1334h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-710--1310h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-686--1267h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-686--1267h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux Spam tokens: 0.993-1--0h-2s--0d--Nils, 0.987-1--0h-1s--0d--H*r:sk:mail.ge, 0.873-243--963h-19699s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org, 0.866-201--1141h-21918s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.866-201--1141h-21918s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: no 2.2 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [201.124.5.140 listed in combined.njabl.org] 1.5 URIBL_RHS_DOB Contains an URI of a new domain (Day Old Bread) [URIs: ackermath.info] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS BODY: T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 T_MIME_NO_TEXT No text body parts List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71982 Archived-At: --=-=-= Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Nils Ackermann writes: > >> It fixes the error message, but not the main problem. > > Digging a bit deeper here, it seemed like it was fetching the expiry > target of the wrong group. This may now be fixed. Nope, sorry. I have minimized the test case even more: use the following .gnus: --=-=-= Content-Type: application/emacs-lisp Content-Disposition: attachment Content-Description: .gnus test file (setq gnus-select-method '(nnnil "")) (setq nnmail-expiry-target "nnfolder:archive") (setq gnus-parameters '(("nndraft:drafts" (expiry-target . delete)))) --=-=-= Start from clean slate. Compose email, save it (^x^s) and send. Inspect file ~/Mail/archive: >From nobody Mon Sep 27 11:15:27 2010 Message-ID: <818w2nupr4.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id> To: nils Subject: test 40 From: Gnus Test Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:15:25 -0500 --text follows this line-- Lines: 0 Xref: thysbe.fqdn.ackermath.info archive:1 X-Gnus-Article-Number: 1 Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:15:27 -0500 There shouldn't even be anything there because supposedly drafts are simply deleted after sending. Of course, the result is the same if removing the setting (setq gnus-parameters '(("nndraft:drafts" (expiry-target . delete)))) from the .gnus file. This only shows that messages from the drafts group should never be expired when sent, but just deleted, under all circumstances. Cheers, Nils --=-=-=--