From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: <ding@gnus.org>
Subject: Re: overriding marks for synchronization
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:50:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vd6q1urj.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878w3ohz1t.fsf@dod.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:59:10 +0200")
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:59:10 +0200 Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> wrote:
>>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>:
>> No, it's OK. I have to work out a nicer merge algorithm instead of
>> "just overwrite." In the process I'll put safeguards around the
>> existing code to catch the cases you describe.
SB> When merging: does it make more sense to merge on the nntp-address
SB> rather than the server name?
SB> I have one gnus that has a different "news" server than the rest of
SB> them.
SB> Hm... I see one problem with this: the nntp-address equivalent is
SB> different, depending on the backend. The server name is consistent
SB> across backends.
SB> Perhaps I should just rename the server name for the default server on
SB> this particular Gnus, from "news" to something different?
SB> I think I'll do that.
Yeah. The idea is to do a logical merge, on the nn* level, not on the
lower protocol level (NNTP or whatever). So the logical server name is
the right key.
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-31 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-10 11:55 Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-11 3:18 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-11 8:51 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-11 13:36 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-12 19:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-13 12:26 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-13 12:44 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-13 12:52 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-13 13:29 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-13 14:12 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-13 14:29 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-13 18:41 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-13 19:39 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-13 19:58 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-14 13:38 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-14 14:55 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-15 11:18 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-18 13:44 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-30 15:59 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-30 16:06 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-31 18:52 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-31 18:50 ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2010-08-31 17:27 ` Steinar Bang
2010-09-02 7:53 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-13 18:48 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-13 19:47 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-15 16:35 ` Didier Verna
2010-08-15 16:39 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-15 17:20 ` Didier Verna
2010-08-17 18:55 ` Steinar Bang
2010-08-18 13:42 ` Ted Zlatanov
2010-08-22 8:21 ` Steinar Bang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vd6q1urj.fsf@lifelogs.com \
--to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).