From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/69059 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: hobbes@poukram.net (=?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9mi?= Letot) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Buffer has a running process when reporting spam to gmane Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:42:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87vdj35b4g.fsf@sphax.lybrafox.lan> References: <87ws3qdqzz.fsf@sphax.lybrafox.lan> <87skeaivwk.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1254152590 10477 80.91.229.12 (28 Sep 2009 15:43:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:43:10 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M17476@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Sep 28 17:43:03 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MsINT-00068t-Dl for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:43:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MsING-0000lz-1C; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:42:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MsINC-0000ld-TL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:42:46 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MsIMz-0006Sq-DW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:42:46 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1MsINc-0003Nd-00 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:43:12 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MsIMu-0005vA-SR for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:42:28 +0200 Original-Received: from 215.125-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be ([81.245.125.215]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:42:28 +0200 Original-Received: from hobbes by 215.125-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:42:28 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 215.125-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TQbTzUXZcOGjy7fOwNGwJ8hUfZI= X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:69059 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:06:40 +0200 hobbes@poukram.net (Rémi Letot) wrote: > > RL> I use gnus and gmane to read many mailing lists, and report spam > RL> whenever I can. I use gnus as packaged in emacs-snapshot on debian, > RL> which tracks emacs development (latest snapshot from 09/09/2009). > > RL> Now I have experienced a small problem for some weeks : whenever I mark > RL> messages as spam in gnus, I have error messages when I quit the group: > > RL> Buffer has a running process; kill it? (y or n) > > RL> The number of messages is equal to the number of marked messages. I > RL> answer "n" (multiple times if needed) and apparently the messages are > RL> correctly reported to gmane as shown in the messages buffer: > > RL> Exiting summary buffer and applying spam rules > RL> Registering 1 specific articles as spam using backend spam-use-gmane > RL> Reporting article 198 to spam.gmane.org... > RL> Buffer has a running process; kill it? (y or n) > RL> 1 spam messages were registered by backend spam-use-gmane. > > RL> I can't remember when that behaviour started, but don't hesitate to ask > RL> for more information if needed. > > I think this may be coming from the function > spam-report-url-ping-plain. Does anyone know why it doesn't use > `url-retrieve' but instead implements its own version? Looks like > Reiner did some work on it last, but the original code is vintage Lars > :) I'm pretty sure I didn't have this behavior "before" (don't ask me when was "before", I couldn't tell when it changed), and it's quite annoying when reporting spam to gmane. Am I the only one encountering this problem ? Thanks, -- Rémi