From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56642 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Russ Allbery Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Regarding spam.el Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:55:42 -0800 Organization: The Eyrie Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87vfldaj7l.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1078862204 18540 80.91.224.253 (9 Mar 2004 19:56:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5182@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 09 20:56:38 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B0nLB-0006g9-00 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 20:56:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B0nKV-0005qA-00; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:55:55 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1B0nKR-0005q5-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 09 Mar 2004 13:55:51 -0600 Original-Received: from smtp2.Stanford.EDU (smtp2.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.116]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C893A005D for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:55:44 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from windlord.stanford.edu (windlord.Stanford.EDU [171.64.19.147]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i29JtgkO017182 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:55:43 -0800 Original-Received: (qmail 26051 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Mar 2004 19:55:42 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Jonas Steverud's message of "Tue, 09 Mar 2004 14:49:22 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56642 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56642 Jonas Steverud writes: > 1. Is gnus-group-*-exit-processor-bogofilter obsolete? If so, it > should be better marked as such in the info file. Same for all > similar obsolete variables. Well, at least in 5.10.6, it doesn't appear to be possible to do without them. I have the following in my initialization file: '(gnus-parameters '(("^nnml\\+sent:" (gnus-use-scoring nil) (gnus-show-threads nil)) ("^nnml:" (gnus-use-scoring nil)) ("^nnml:lists\\." (gnus-use-scoring t)) ("^nnml:mail\\.\\(spam.*\\|misc\\)" (spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-spam) (spam-process (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))) ("^nnml:\\(mail\\.\\(eyrie\\|rra\\|bounces\\|root\\)\\|project\\..*\\)" (gnus-use-scoring t) (spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-ham) (spam-process (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))) ("^nnml:work\\.\\(personal\\|ls\\|news.*\\)" (spam-contents gnus-group-spam-classification-ham) (spam-process (gnus-group-spam-exit-processor-bogofilter gnus-group-ham-exit-processor-bogofilter))))) If I replace those instances of gnus-group-*-exit-processor-bogofilter with '(spam spam-use-bogofilter) and the like as described in the manual, exit processing no longer happens and nothing gets registered with bogofilter. I tried a few variations with and without the ' and the ()s and couldn't get it to work. Maybe I'm missing something? -- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)