* Proposal for `gnus-gcc-inhibit-security'
@ 2003-04-19 15:15 Marshall T. Vandegrift
2003-04-19 15:30 ` Marshall T. Vandegrift
2003-04-27 3:18 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marshall T. Vandegrift @ 2003-04-19 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]
Hi,
In gnu.emacs.gnus there was a discussion that resulted in the
following message:
<news://news.gmane.org/iluu1cuk5xw.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
and Simon Josefsson suggesting the possibility of a
`gnus-gcc-inhibit-security' variable that would suppress the
processing of `#secure' MML directives when posting via GCC.
What do people think? I like the idea, and would like to see it
implemented. In fact, I'm willing to try implementing it myself, but
I'm new here ;-) and just starting to find my way around the Gnus
code. So if this does seem like a good idea and no one else wants to
do it, I'll start writing...
--
Marshall T. Vandegrift <vandem2@rpi.edu>
They were all, one might say, nonexistent, but each
non-existed in an entirely different way.
-- Stanislaw Lem, /The Cyberiad/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Proposal for `gnus-gcc-inhibit-security'
2003-04-19 15:15 Proposal for `gnus-gcc-inhibit-security' Marshall T. Vandegrift
@ 2003-04-19 15:30 ` Marshall T. Vandegrift
2003-04-27 3:18 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marshall T. Vandegrift @ 2003-04-19 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 394 bytes --]
I wrote:
> <news://news.gmane.org/iluu1cuk5xw.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Hmm. I don't know why I thought that message would have ended up on
gmane... *shrug* Apologies for the invalid link.
--
Marshall T. Vandegrift <vandem2@rpi.edu>
Kublai: We have proved that if we were here, we
would not be.
Polo: And here, in fact, we are.
-- Italo Calvino, /Invisible Cities/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Proposal for `gnus-gcc-inhibit-security'
2003-04-19 15:15 Proposal for `gnus-gcc-inhibit-security' Marshall T. Vandegrift
2003-04-19 15:30 ` Marshall T. Vandegrift
@ 2003-04-27 3:18 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2003-04-27 3:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
Marshall T. Vandegrift <vandem2@rpi.edu> writes:
> and Simon Josefsson suggesting the possibility of a
> `gnus-gcc-inhibit-security' variable that would suppress the
> processing of `#secure' MML directives when posting via GCC.
>
> What do people think? I like the idea, and would like to see it
> implemented. In fact, I'm willing to try implementing it myself, but
> I'm new here ;-) and just starting to find my way around the Gnus
> code. So if this does seem like a good idea and no one else wants to
> do it, I'll start writing...
It sounds like it would be useful, so go ahead. :-)
But since we're in feature freeze, it probably wouldn't be a good
idea to add this until No Gnus.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-27 3:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-19 15:15 Proposal for `gnus-gcc-inhibit-security' Marshall T. Vandegrift
2003-04-19 15:30 ` Marshall T. Vandegrift
2003-04-27 3:18 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).