From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49025
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Getting started with spam filtering
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 05:55:43 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <87vg0xvc1c.fsf@emacswiki.org>
References: <u65t1hxtz.fsf@axis.com> <m3znqdyq7z.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
	<84u1gkfa84.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<4n65szll2k.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> <uptr64unv.fsf@axis.com>
	<4nr8bmb8bd.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu>
	<87znq9vrfb.fsf@emacswiki.org> <m3u1ghg3l0.fsf@heechee.beld.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042174531 2278 80.91.224.249 (10 Jan 2003 04:55:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 04:55:31 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18WrCb-0000aU-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 05:55:30 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 18WrDA-0003NL-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 22:56:04 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 09 Jan 2003 22:56:59 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA20410
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 22:56:45 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 21239 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2003 04:55:45 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 21234 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 04:55:45 -0000
Original-Received: from isp247n.hispeed.ch (HELO smtp.hispeed.ch) (62.2.95.247)
  by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2003 04:55:45 -0000
Original-Received: from confusibombus (dclient217-162-234-9.hispeed.ch [217.162.234.9])
	by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id h0A4temh026512
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 05:55:43 +0100
Original-Received: from alex by confusibombus with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18WrCp-0000XS-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 05:55:43 +0100
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: ^BC$`[IcggstLPyen&dqF+b2'zyK#r.mU*'Nms}@&4zw%SJ#5!/7SMVjBS7'lb;QK)|IPU5U'o1'522W4TyzB3Ab*IBo^iw]l4|kUbdZuUDO6=Um-.4IzhNiV'B"@K#jy_(wW|Zbk[34flKY^|PrQ?$u2\fKg^]AY>wOX#H32i
In-Reply-To: <m3u1ghg3l0.fsf@heechee.beld.net> (Ted Zlatanov's message of
 "Thu, 09 Jan 2003 21:07:23 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090011 (Oort Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.2.92
 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49025
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49025

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> I would assume Gnus doesn't need to be any slower than it already is.
> If people *want* the extra slowness, they can load the two as you
> indicated above.  But I see no reason, if we can help it, to add extra
> processing when spam-stat.el is loaded by spam.el.
>
> Are you OK with the other changes in the patch?

I am ok with all the changes.  My only point was that it makes
understanding and maintenance a bit more complicated for a relatively
small gain in performance (and nobody has yet measured the effect of
it).  But that is all.

Alex.