From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/40102 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Matt Armstrong" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: controlling whether gnus splits long Subject: lines, for example, this one Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 09:11:43 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87vggm36io.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> References: <87y9ljh7gu.fsf@pixie.eng.ascend.com> <87k7x33wya.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> <87u1w72bbm.fsf@xyzzy.adsl.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035175704 31446 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:48:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 29277 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2001 16:13:19 -0000 Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu (mail@129.7.128.13) by mastaler.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2001 16:13:19 -0000 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 161VJS-0008Ny-00; Wed, 07 Nov 2001 10:12:26 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 07 Nov 2001 10:12:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA24350 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:11:54 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 29262 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2001 16:12:03 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 29257 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2001 16:12:02 -0000 Original-Received: from hank.lickey.com (64.81.100.235) by gnus.org with SMTP; 7 Nov 2001 16:12:02 -0000 Original-Received: from squeaker.lickey.com (squeaker.lickey.com [192.168.100.10]) by hank.lickey.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C247EDA7 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:11:48 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by squeaker.lickey.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3796BD35 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:11:47 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: by squeaker.lickey.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6653FBD48; Wed, 7 Nov 2001 09:11:46 -0700 (MST) Original-To: Peter Makholm Mail-Followup-To: peter@makholm.net, ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87u1w72bbm.fsf@xyzzy.adsl.dk> (Peter Makholm's message of "Wed, 07 Nov 2001 10:13:17 +0100") Original-Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA v0.40/Python 1.5.2 (linux2) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20010714 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40102 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:40102 Peter Makholm writes: > matt+dated+1007707248.2aa5f2@lickey.com ("Matt Armstrong") writes: > > [Just wrote to gnu.emacs.gnus a couple of days ago] > >> Actually, they don't have to be split and many mailers do not do it. >> Gnus started doing it only recently. I believe the behavior is >> recommended by the standards though. > > Very recently. I know that the standard allows hjeader folding but I > use a couple of mailbots that gets commands through the subject line. > fixing the bots would take a lot of time I dont have. > >> But the answer to Jim's question is no -- the code that does this >> wrapping has no hook that allows any exceptions, nor is there a way to >> prevent the code from running when a message is sent. > > I couldn't find the code at all. Can you point me to it so I > eventually can remove it by hand? See rfc2047.el and search for the comment "No encoding necessary, but folding is nice" -- matt