From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35949
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dmitry Paduchih <paduch@imm.uran.ru>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?q?=C6=D8=C5?= -- QP in subject
Date: 19 Apr 2001 22:00:18 +0600
Sender: paduch@imm.uran.ru
Message-ID: <87vgo06fsd.fsf@ait.uran.ru>
References: <3196664716389165@oakhurst.yi.org>
	<vafofttuq21.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<3196667051873244@oakhurst.yi.org>
	<vafu23ltabm.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<rj8zkx3yd4.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk> <87zodd5506.fsf@ait.uran.ru>
	<rju23lylry.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171617 5918 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:40:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:40:17 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 24974 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2001 16:43:05 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 24969 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 16:43:01 -0000
Original-Received: from atreyu.ural.net (HELO relay.uran.ru) (195.19.137.69)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 16:43:01 -0000
Original-Received: from ait.uran.ru (dialup38.uran.ru [195.19.137.228])
	by relay.uran.ru (8.11.1/eTn) with ESMTP id f3JGrQ369008
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:53:27 +0600 (ESS)
Original-Received: from dima by ait.uran.ru with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14qGr0-0008TA-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:00:22 +0600
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <rju23lylry.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk> (Per Abrahamsen's message of "19 Apr 2001 17:03:29 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7
Original-Lines: 13
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35949
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35949

>>>>> "PA" == Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:

PA> Dmitry Paduchih <paduch@imm.uran.ru> writes:
>> Well, probably it is a bad idea... But it would be worse idea to use
>> unencoded UTF8 in the newsgroup or a mailing list where nobody uses it...

PA> Yes, in the transition period using MIME encoded headers is the least
PA> bad option.

I'm agree. RFC2047 is a great thing. :-) Unfortunately, it is fringe
at some places. Say, in the hierarchy of fido7.*.

                Dmitry