From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 31354 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2023 17:13:35 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 27 Jun 2023 17:13:35 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qECFw-003WwU-2m for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:13:32 -0500 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qECFv-0029vT-2j for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:13:31 -0500 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qECFs-0029vK-2c for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:13:28 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qECFn-000ZnB-2r for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 12:13:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WnD8FV+6NXh2YivmBlE0nKH5e8PWkeOj7N4IaSrXwZs=; b=p9MFbgRZl39NXC44nnDXNEARNb mvhUpK+o1D6h2UpKHPdU9SxmiXc8QQS5N87j9+kHOt/UOPaQ9raqr/1PO9iHk0Tsifn8uuh+zx8jA UyDxissDQ+WUNFRBn3SdlZFAHMCNQC4ZJO9p8ONMBlOXpYhD0sIWxiI88p87EzDmfrac=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qECFd-0005tO-CR for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 19:13:17 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qECFb-00079o-DI for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2023 19:13:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Steinar Bang Subject: Re: list level not respected by gnus-group-get-new-news [was: Emacs 28.2 gnus: nntp read marks lost after going offline and online again] Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 19:13:05 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87wmzoakwu.fsf@dod.no> References: <871qi7ld1z.fsf@dod.no> <87sfanju2y.fsf@dod.no> <87edm7jqj7.fsf@dod.no> <877cryhr7n.fsf@dod.no> <87352lj4hx.fsf@dod.no> <87fs6ltwz7.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y1kc8xgw.fsf@dod.no> <87ttv0h9qm.fsf@dod.no> <87352keg3b.fsf@dod.no> <87zg4sr1d6.fsf@dod.no> <87v8fgr0vb.fsf@dod.no> <871qi338pc.fsf@uwo.ca> <87pm5lv23m.fsf@dod.no> <87352fy8bt.fsf@uwo.ca> <871qhzboe5.fsf@dod.no> <87r0pzujhu.fsf_-_@uwo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FMi+o1fSGvXimtyxXp6V5Xg4sIw= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk >>>>> Dan Christensen : > In the first message you said that the groups lost their marks, so I > was still under the impression that that was the issue. Yeah, in my first message, I thought that was the issue. Note that I feel very relieved to learn that this wasn't actually the issue. :-) > If the groups are just not being *displayed*, then `3 l' will show the > groups on levels <= 3. Yup, I understood that part once you showed that '2 g' would make stuff disappear, and '3 g' would make them reappear. > Indeed, digging around shows this commit from two years ago: > https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commit/7f9ca3b2f4f1a9800d7557f64e25bb3ee5059cba > where lines 4208-4209 are changed from > (gnus-group-list-groups (and (numberp arg) > (max (car gnus-group-list-mode) arg))) > to > (gnus-group-list-groups (and (numberp arg) arg)) > So the current list level is not taken into account any more. I also > find this a bit annoying, to tell you the truth. Good to hear! :-) > Even more, the new code goes on to make this permanent: > (when gnus-group-use-permanent-levels > (setq gnus-group-use-permanent-levels (gnus-group-default-level arg))))) Hm...:-/ > Do others think it makes sense to hide groups currently being displayed > just because I refreshed groups at a lower level? > (I've changed the subject to reflect what's really going on here.) Noted!