From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 29590 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2021 21:07:20 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Nov 2021 21:07:20 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mkBrK-003Ass-AY for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 15:07:18 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mkBrJ-000AnQ-Iz for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 15:07:17 -0600 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mkBrH-000AnH-9G for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 15:07:15 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mkBrE-008TjL-Oy for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 15:07:14 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=UhcHynTZ4r9hGmV3+wAsWjAnVJ5V0FhsBzRlNhH5ucU=; b=CyVIRv0/X6e/avNQAci61qdD49 2mtsTBN+tHKoe70zemxLqSEnN+krlukrWwsbAuiijz9MqvnNKvSIaH5Wxb+bqUP0dTO7B8Z2iLarp qomRPbhPjDtIcn1EAsc0SZ/HwA79eWpnUSTS5TGH3OmPq2Uj5H7JcQTHltBSsz7i51ps=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mkBr4-0005ie-T0 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 22:07:07 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mkBr1-0009NI-KA for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 22:06:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: per group split rules Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2021 22:06:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87wnli2w7n.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <87wnlipien.fsf@gnus.jao.io> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0h0FTxnWsk5WyU0Ov129DFyAR1w= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote: > i have my mail-sources set to '((group)), so that each of my > nnml groups has a mail-source of its own (typically reading > a spool file or a local maildir, populated asynchronously). > is there a way of having split rules (fancy or not) that > apply /only/ to a given nnml group, rather than globally to > all incoming mail? Respooling perhaps ... how often/when is this supposed to happen? > or, alternatively, is it possible to have a (global) split > rule that says (when nnmail-resplit-incoming is t) something > like: "leave this message in the group which fetched it via > its mail-source parameter"? You can use functions instead of regexps both with fancy and regular so put it there if so, I guess? > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? Ha. See RFC 3676, section 4.3 (Usenet Signature Convention) https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3676.txt for the second most annoying thing. (Actually it isn't so annoying.) -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal