From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/87962 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: warn about a BCC field Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 23:15:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87woxayfj8.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87d1eaa0q2.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87d0z51px0.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87vacualzc.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87k1tasuz9.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87lgdqakkw.fsf@mat.ucm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523654046 22234 195.159.176.226 (13 Apr 2018 21:14:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 21:14:06 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+m36176@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Apr 13 23:14:02 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com ([107.189.48.34]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f761C-0005f2-3N for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 23:14:02 +0200 X-Yomura-MXScrub: 1.0 Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu (unknown [129.7.128.208]) by mxfilter-048034.atla03.us.yomura.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id d7068984-3f5f-11e8-950a-b499baa2b07a; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 21:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f762e-0004IN-Jb; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f762b-0004HZ-FM for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:15:29 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f762a-00040c-25 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:15:29 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1f762O-0007D7-LR for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 23:15:19 +0200 Original-Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f762M-0005k5-AF for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 23:15:16 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f762G-0002yS-5I for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 23:15:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lgdqakkw.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2018 22:59:59 +0200") X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "hermes.netfonds.no", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Uwe Brauer writes: > Did I explain my problem now better? Oh, I see. You were Bcc'd on a message, but then did a wide reply that revealed to the other people in the conversation that you were party to the conversation, and you didn't want to do that. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87962 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer writes: > Did I explain my problem now better? Oh, I see. You were Bcc'd on a message, but then did a wide reply that revealed to the other people in the conversation that you were party to the conversation, and you didn't want to do that. Well, first of all: Mail agents are supposed to strip the Bcc header before sending the mail, so you shouldn't have gotten that Bcc header. So that's a bug in the software that sent you the mail. But the question is: If you're not listed in To/Cc in a mail, and you do a wide reply, should Gnus warn you about what you're doing? I don't think so: It's a very common situation, especially with mailing lists. So I don't really think there's anything here to be done on the Gnus side, but your my-check-bcc sounds nice for your specific use case, though. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no