From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/83632 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Buffer called *sent wide reply to TG * but he was not one of the recipients Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 11:28:38 +0800 Message-ID: <87wqo378rd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <8738qsfrva.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375501033 19869 80.91.229.3 (3 Aug 2013 03:37:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 03:37:13 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M31888@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Aug 03 05:37:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V5SeR-0005GX-BZ for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 05:37:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1V5SVy-0004D8-Qs; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 22:28:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1V5SVx-0004Cx-Ae for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 22:28:21 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V5SVs-0005L8-1S for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 22:28:16 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1V5SVq-0004Ug-2c for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 05:28:14 +0200 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V5SVp-0008Sb-6j for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 05:28:13 +0200 Original-Received: from 221.216.167.20 ([221.216.167.20]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 05:28:13 +0200 Original-Received: from eric by 221.216.167.20 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 03 Aug 2013 05:28:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 221.216.167.20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hoVf+V27SqMmN35uXwEgJTe4ECM= X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0001 Ham tokens: 0.000-2319--14296h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-737--4539h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-693--4269h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux, 0.000-693--4268h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-682--4204h-0s--0d--H*UA:gnu Spam tokens: 0.989-9390--602h-48899s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.989-9777--635h-50955s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.989-9777--635h-50955s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.986-9609--803h-50957s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-Internal:quimby.gnus.org, 0.986-9609--803h-50957s--0d--H*RT:80.91.231.51 Autolearn status: no 2.3 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2 1.2 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO -1.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0001] List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:83632 Archived-At: jidanni@jidanni.org writes: > Type S W (runs the command > gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original,) > > Now alter the headers so the guy listed in the buffer name is no longer > one of the recipients. > > Now send the message. > > Well that buffer name is now changed to be called > *sent wide reply to TG * > > But in fact he was not one of recipients! > > I mean if you are going to change the buffer name, might as well change > it to one of the recipients! > > gnus-version "Gnus v5.13" Looks like you could get the behavior you want by taking `message-default-send-rename-function', removing the if statement (just leave the "else" part), giving that function a new name, and setting `message-send-rename-function' to the name of your new function. Totally untested! E