Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
	ding@gnus.org
Subject: bug#10238: R in gnus-summary does not pop a frame like F does
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:00:13 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wr8fhloi.fsf@lifelogs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1RpwNd-0008Fp-W0@fencepost.gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:30:49 -0500")

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:30:49 -0500 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote: 

>> From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  10238@debbugs.gnu.org,  larsi@gnus.org,  ding@gnus.org
>> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:02:06 +0100
>> 
>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> 
>> > We're talking about VCS commit messages, not docstrings.  It's a
>> > different context, and for VCS commits often there is information that
>> > needs to be distilled into that first line and 80 chars are not enough.
>> 
>> The summary line doesn't need to be precise.  It should just give an
>> informal overview of the change.

EZ> 100% agreement.

OK, but we're not talking about the destiny of the summary line in a VCS
commit, but rather whether it should be limited to 80 chars.

I think we should try to keep it under 80, and if it has to go over, the
essential information should be before the 80th char.  But forcing it to
80 will force us to write convoluted summaries that misrepresent the
commit for the sake of saving a few characters.

Please note we're talking about Gnus here, not Emacs.  We could ask
Yamaoka-san, who synchronizes Gnus into Emacs, to cut or rewrite long
commit summary lines so they don't bother Emacs developers.  But forcing
the Gnus developers to use 80 chars in their own work seems too harsh.

Ted





  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-25 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <jwvpqg1cskp.fsf-monnier+@gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <m3sjjvnpw4.fsf@stories.gnus.org>
     [not found]   ` <jwvvcorymdh.fsf-monnier+INBOX@gnu.org>
2012-01-24 22:00     ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-24 21:25       ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-01-24 22:34         ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-24 23:02           ` Andreas Schwab
2012-01-25  6:30             ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-01-25 15:00               ` Ted Zlatanov [this message]
2012-01-25 22:56                 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-26 15:34                   ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-01-30 22:45                 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2012-01-31  1:46                   ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wr8fhloi.fsf@lifelogs.com \
    --to=tzz@lifelogs.com \
    --cc=10238@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=ding@gnus.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).