* Buildbot + registry errors
@ 2011-04-24 19:29 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-04-24 19:42 ` David Engster
2011-04-25 4:06 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-04-24 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Whenever somebody checks something in, they get a message about the
failed build, and it's because of:
---
Ran 6 tests, 5 results as expected, 1 unexpected (2011-04-24 21:19:54+0200)
1 unexpected results:
FAILED gnus-registry-usage-test
---
Ted, could you fix the test, or remove it?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Buildbot + registry errors
2011-04-24 19:29 Buildbot + registry errors Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2011-04-24 19:42 ` David Engster
2011-04-25 4:06 ` Ted Zlatanov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Engster @ 2011-04-24 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes:
> Whenever somebody checks something in, they get a message about the
> failed build,
It's going to the gnus-buildbot mailing list. I'd recommend to just read
it via Gmane, otherwise it will get annoying soon. You will only get a
mail directly if there's a *new* failing build and you are on the
'blamelist' (meaning you have committed since the last build).
-David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Buildbot + registry errors
2011-04-24 19:29 Buildbot + registry errors Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-04-24 19:42 ` David Engster
@ 2011-04-25 4:06 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-25 8:04 ` David Engster
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2011-04-25 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:29:47 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
LMI> Whenever somebody checks something in, they get a message about the
LMI> failed build
That seems like something BuildBot should not be doing. It should CC
everyone involved since the LAST failure, not just the last committer.
But my problem was that I forgot to subscribe to the buildbot mailing
list. "It's so quiet around here..."
LMI> and it's because of:
LMI> ---
LMI> Ran 6 tests, 5 results as expected, 1 unexpected (2011-04-24 21:19:54+0200)
LMI> 1 unexpected results:
LMI> FAILED gnus-registry-usage-test
LMI> ---
LMI> Ted, could you fix the test, or remove it?
It's a problem with `gnus-parameter-registry-ignore': it fails if the
*Group* (`gnus-group-buffer') buffer doesn't exist. But this is a
problem deeper in Gnus.
I put a workaround for it, but I think `gnus-group-find-parameter'
should be fixed instead, see below (simply added a `when get-buffer'
around). Do you agree?
Ted
diff --git a/lisp/gnus.el b/lisp/gnus.el
index c30eaba..f12d5f4 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus.el
+++ b/lisp/gnus.el
@@ -3873,13 +3873,14 @@ If SYMBOL, return the value of that symbol in the group parameters.
If you call this function inside a loop, consider using the faster
`gnus-group-fast-parameter' instead."
- (with-current-buffer gnus-group-buffer
- (if symbol
- (gnus-group-fast-parameter group symbol allow-list)
- (nconc
- (copy-sequence
- (funcall gnus-group-get-parameter-function group))
- (gnus-parameters-get-parameter group)))))
+ (when (get-buffer gnus-group-buffer)
+ (with-current-buffer gnus-group-buffer
+ (if symbol
+ (gnus-group-fast-parameter group symbol allow-list)
+ (nconc
+ (copy-sequence
+ (funcall gnus-group-get-parameter-function group))
+ (gnus-parameters-get-parameter group))))))
(defun gnus-group-get-parameter (group &optional symbol allow-list)
"Return the group parameters for GROUP.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Buildbot + registry errors
2011-04-25 4:06 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2011-04-25 8:04 ` David Engster
2011-04-25 12:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Engster @ 2011-04-25 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Ted Zlatanov writes:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:29:47 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
>
> LMI> Whenever somebody checks something in, they get a message about the
> LMI> failed build
>
> That seems like something BuildBot should not be doing. It should CC
> everyone involved since the LAST failure, not just the last committer.
Here's the current (since Apr 21st) setup:
- The buildbot checks the git repo about 10x per hour.
- If it finds a new HEAD, it pulls and runs the builders.
- If a build was OK previously but now fails, it will send a mail
- to the buildbot mailinglist
- to every committer who was part in generating the new HEAD (the so
called "blamelist").
- If a build failed again (meaning it also failed in the previous
build), a mail will *only* be sent to the buildbot mailinglist.
> But my problem was that I forgot to subscribe to the buildbot mailing
> list. "It's so quiet around here..."
The buildbot did send a mails directly to you when the build initially
broke:
2011-04-20 23:11:13 1QCeQL-0001Jb-JT => tzz@lifelogs.com ...
2011-04-20 23:11:13 1QCeQL-0001Jb-JT Completed
2011-04-20 23:11:14 1QCeRS-0001ZZ-FM => tzz@lifelogs.com ...
2011-04-20 23:11:14 1QCeRS-0001ZZ-FM Completed
Didn't those came through? The domain has proper DKIM signing, SPF and
all that.
-David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Buildbot + registry errors
2011-04-25 8:04 ` David Engster
@ 2011-04-25 12:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2011-04-25 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:04:06 +0200 David Engster <deng@randomsample.de> wrote:
DE> Here's the current (since Apr 21st) setup:
DE> - The buildbot checks the git repo about 10x per hour.
DE> - If it finds a new HEAD, it pulls and runs the builders.
DE> - If a build was OK previously but now fails, it will send a mail
DE> - to the buildbot mailinglist
DE> - to every committer who was part in generating the new HEAD (the so
DE> called "blamelist").
DE> - If a build failed again (meaning it also failed in the previous
DE> build), a mail will *only* be sent to the buildbot mailinglist.
This is great, exactly what we need. I thought it might be sending
alerts unnecessarily, but I shouldn't have doubted ;)
>> But my problem was that I forgot to subscribe to the buildbot mailing
>> list. "It's so quiet around here..."
DE> The buildbot did send a mails directly to you when the build initially
DE> broke:
DE> 2011-04-20 23:11:13 1QCeQL-0001Jb-JT => tzz@lifelogs.com ...
DE> 2011-04-20 23:11:13 1QCeQL-0001Jb-JT Completed
DE> 2011-04-20 23:11:14 1QCeRS-0001ZZ-FM => tzz@lifelogs.com ...
DE> 2011-04-20 23:11:14 1QCeRS-0001ZZ-FM Completed
DE> Didn't those came through? The domain has proper DKIM signing, SPF and
DE> all that.
They did, I put them on my TODO list, then life interfered as usual and
I forgot all about it. The mighty BuildBot did nothing wrong.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-25 12:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-24 19:29 Buildbot + registry errors Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-04-24 19:42 ` David Engster
2011-04-25 4:06 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-25 8:04 ` David Engster
2011-04-25 12:24 ` Ted Zlatanov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).