From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75239 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.user,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Error in (info "(gnus)Splitting Mail") Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:16:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87wrn73386.fsf_-_@gmail.com> References: <87fwtwzqm5.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87aak4488w.fsf_-_@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292660339 9316 80.91.229.12 (18 Dec 2010 08:18:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 08:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: info-gnus-english@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org To: Tommy Kelly Original-X-From: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 18 09:18:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTs0E-0005kz-KG for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:18:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52762 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTs0D-0005Ra-Ts for gegu-info-gnus-english@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:18:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50585 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTs0A-0005RJ-UU for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:18:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTs09-0004jT-S8 for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f48.google.com ([209.85.161.48]:38540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTs09-0004j8-NZ for info-gnus-english@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 03:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so1370727fxm.35 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:18:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=N+Dbs53e6EqxgIZVW7BXh+2tv6tUgpvJGsJPFErgJ7I=; b=ooEIh7RJNQ64UEHA4FePJBDFV5UCEMTEx0+elaL4Kk4txluvz6kGVo0J2Cv4Ggxjn0 UjmXY7uZtpZJZlfSUID+8wjw6Jl+T6UPkJgPZuvjEjKJh4HtYrq2gnQdd0VNRroX07R7 lYpmwxX1FfyBz/TPfkJbZ3YnPF3sXKakrzVuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WsrAXIsFPQU2jwJhxlzCRbqJRF4SNKK+Y3guf04JB4U9P4jsmInO7LfAkJScxfDZaw 8IeT4NWPHEBBqYEfhJnTor5XIb6smKhZBduqaQEyj2mKLu4P5k0NxFuJxuL+zYoCZB2F rUu+NJrqKDwC5a3Kqx1/pzLeme9JGAAEebB9U= Original-Received: by 10.223.75.194 with SMTP id z2mr2182326faj.38.1292660328456; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:18:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (176.119.broadband10.iol.cz [90.177.119.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a6sm240394fak.3.2010.12.18.00.18.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:18:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Tommy Kelly's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:39:53 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: info-gnus-english@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Announcements and discussions for GNUS, the GNU Emacs Usenet newsreader \(in English\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: info-gnus-english-bounces+gegu-info-gnus-english=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.user:14330 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75239 Archived-At: Tommy Kelly writes: > Thanks =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n. I think I'd figure that but what was confus= ing me was the > fact that an unescaped dot was shown in examples for the non-fancy > split method. For example, in info "6.3.3 Splitting Mail" you see an > example of: > > ("list.\\1" "From:.* \\(.*\\)-list@majordomo.com") > > So shouldn't the dot after "majordomo" be double escaped? Yeah, that's obviously just an error in the documentation, but a mostly harmless one, as "." matches the dot anyway... Cc-ing the ding list. =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n