From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74541 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Christensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Improving Gnus speed Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:30:45 -0500 Message-ID: <87wrnv4y2i.fsf@uwo.ca> References: <87zktemkwl.fsf@uwo.ca> <87vd42mdci.fsf@uwo.ca> <87r5e555e0.fsf@uwo.ca> <87aaks53my.fsf@uwo.ca> <871v636fri.fsf@uwo.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291066279 21429 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2010 21:31:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:31:19 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22900@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 29 22:31:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNBJZ-00064L-9n for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:31:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PNBJN-0002Tv-0G; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:31:01 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PNBJL-0002Ti-Qd for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:30:59 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PNBJK-0003Il-8s for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:30:59 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PNBJJ-0001N2-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:30:57 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNBJI-0005xC-Ha for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:30:56 +0100 Original-Received: from bas3-london14-1096779322.dsl.bell.ca ([65.95.134.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:30:56 +0100 Original-Received: from jdc by bas3-london14-1096779322.dsl.bell.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:30:56 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: bas3-london14-1096779322.dsl.bell.ca User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mk/T/XAtoOpqtOPfBGabgV5zHSQ= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74541 Archived-At: Francis Moreau writes: > Dan Christensen writes: > >> On my laptop, with 6500 articles, we're only talking about 1.3 seconds, >> so this is already pretty good. But I suspect it can be sped up. > > I agree this is good. > > But that's no what I get with 1300 *cached* articles. I still have > almost 10 seconds to get the summary buffer. The 1.3 seconds I mentioned was just the time for date parsing. It takes something like 13 or 15 seconds for the full summary buffer generation in my test group. Dan