From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71099 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steinar Bang Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: More IMAP testing, please Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:41:50 +0200 Organization: Probably a good idea Message-ID: <87wrqhoi4h.fsf@dod.no> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284910942 12713 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2010 15:42:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 15:42:22 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19472@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 19 17:42:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxM1w-0001RO-RX for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:42:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OxM1v-0000dK-Nr; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:42:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OxM1u-0000cv-5b for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:42:14 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxM1g-0002Kl-TN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:42:14 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OxM1g-0003ax-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:42:00 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxM1d-0001JC-9m for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:41:57 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no ([84.208.200.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:41:57 +0200 Original-Received: from sb by cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:41:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.208.200.46.getinternet.no Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Tn/SuYbweBaRbC2pNmLUNQUvweY= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71099 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen : > We got a fair amount of nnimap testing and bug stomping yesterday, but > I'm sure there must be a lot more problems hiding here and there, so > it'd be great if more IMAP users took the plunge and gave the new > nnimap a whirl and report problems (or whether it works fine for > your). To all the fence sitters: it now works for me with a single dovecot and agent. And it is a _lot_ faster than the old version. Especially at startup and on `g' (it may be that there are other speedups here, in the way gnus now scans groups over multiple servers. I have a single nnimap and 3 or 4 nntp servers, all agentized).