Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[David S. Goldberg]

/ M G

works for me.
-- 
Dave Goldberg
david.goldberg6@verizon.net

how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[Uwe Brauer]

Hello


I searched  the manual but could not  find out how to exclude messages
in the summary buffer I already deleted.

That is I enter a group (say with the nnimap backend). I delete some
messages. These are now sort of marked with the letter g. Now I
don't want to see them in my summary buffer. Of course I could leave
that group and reenter and indeed they are gone. 

But is there any more direct way in order to no exclude these
messages? I thought the `limit'  function might be a candidate. But
there seems to be no gnus-summary-limit-exclude-deleted-articles.

Thanks


Uwe Brauer 

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[Uwe Brauer]

>>>>> "David" == David S Goldberg <david.goldberg6@verizon.net> writes:

   David> / M G
   David> works for me.

Thanks, that works. I wonder where that information is hidden in the
docs?

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[David S. Goldberg]

At least in No Gnus, it's in the section called Limiting.
-- 
Dave Goldberg
david.goldberg6@verizon.net

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[J. David Boyd]

david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) writes:

> At least in No Gnus, it's in the section called Limiting.


I've look around, and googled, but I must be doing something wrong, as I can't
find anything definitive about No Gnus.

What is it, where does it come from, and how/why is it different from Gnus?

TIA,

Dave in Largo, FL

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[David S. Goldberg]

>>>>> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:03:29 -0400, david@adboyd.com (J. David
>>>>> Boyd) said:

> david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) writes:
>> At least in No Gnus, it's in the section called Limiting.


> I've look around, and googled, but I must be doing something wrong,
> as I can't find anything definitive about No Gnus.

> What is it, where does it come from, and how/why is it different
> from Gnus?

It's the (for lack of a better term) code name for the current
development version of Gnus.  My reason for naming it is that I have
no idea if it's properly documented in the current production
version.

-- 
Dave Goldberg
david.goldberg6@verizon.net

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[J. David Boyd]

david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) writes:

>>>>>> On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:03:29 -0400, david@adboyd.com (J. David
>>>>>> Boyd) said:
>
>> david.goldberg6@verizon.net (David S. Goldberg) writes:
>>> At least in No Gnus, it's in the section called Limiting.
>
>
>> I've look around, and googled, but I must be doing something wrong,
>> as I can't find anything definitive about No Gnus.
>
>> What is it, where does it come from, and how/why is it different
>> from Gnus?
>
> It's the (for lack of a better term) code name for the current
> development version of Gnus.  My reason for naming it is that I have
> no idea if it's properly documented in the current production
> version.

So when it moves over and gets released as a stable version, it then becomes
GNUS?  Okay, that makes sense to me.

Thanks for the info.

Dave in Largo, FL

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[Uwe Brauer]

>>>>> "David" == David S Goldberg <david.goldberg6@verizon.net> writes:

   David> At least in No Gnus, it's in the section called Limiting.


Oops no, I just checked the nognus 0.3 version
there is no reference to 
/ M G
there is reference to 
/ M

But how do I know that I have to use `G'?

Uwe 

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[Uwe Brauer]

I just wrote nonsense pls ignore my last reply

Uwe 

Re: how to exclude deleted articles in the summary buffer

[Adam Sjøgren]

On Mon, 08 Aug 2005 14:22:49 -0400, J. wrote:

> So when it moves over and gets released as a stable version, it then
> becomes GNUS? Okay, that makes sense to me.

Almost. It becomes Gnus. GNUS is very old.


  Best regards,

-- 
 "Halleluja og hurlumhej"                                     Adam Sjøgren
                                                         asjo@koldfront.dk