Re: Gnus SPAM support, and email based reporting.

[Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>]

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Steinar Bang wrote:
>>>>>> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>:
> 
>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, sb@dod.no wrote:
> 
>>> Note that there are two different ways of reporting the spam: 
>>> - as resends 
>>> - MIME attachments
> 
>> We'll just add a digest and attachment version of the reporter:
> 
>> (defun spam-report-resend-attachment (&rest articles)
>> ...)
>> (defun spam-report-resend-digest (&rest articles)
>> ...)
> 
> That would make it three different ways.  By "resend" I meant what
> happens when you do `S D r'.  It's what I need for one of my
> addresses.

That, also, is what I need to do, because...

> The difference between resend attachment and resend digest is that
> with the latter, the message/rfc822 parts are wrapped inside a
> multipart/digest, and the first part should be skipped when unpacking.
> I don't know how significant this difference would be for the
> unpacking filter...?

...at the moment I don't have an 'unpack' filter, I just deliver to an
mbox on the server, and that is then fed whole into the Baysean learning
tool.

Having to write a filter to extract the message content from a digest
before sending it into the learning package would not make me happy. :)

       Daniel
-- 
The lives of the best of us are spent in choosing between evils.
        -- Junius