From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57119 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Pittman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus SPAM support, and email based reporting. Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:45:45 +1000 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: <87wu4787di.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> References: <87isfy7p6a.fsf@enki.rimspace.net> <1xmm1vhg.fsf@random.localnet.unwireduniverse.com> <4nzn95gwu7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fzawgyxq.fsf@dod.no> <4npt9zj1x6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zn93xnoq.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1082706664 4745 80.91.224.253 (23 Apr 2004 07:51:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5659@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Apr 23 09:50:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BGvSY-0000QP-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:50:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BGvS7-0003I8-00; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:50:27 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BGvRv-0003I0-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BGvRu-0008RH-B7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EAC3A0208 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:50:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BGvRr-00086W-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:50:11 +0200 Original-Received: from 203-217-29-45.perm.iinet.net.au ([203.217.29.45]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:50:11 +0200 Original-Received: from daniel by 203-217-29-45.perm.iinet.net.au with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:50:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 39 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203-217-29-45.perm.iinet.net.au User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:1dTHOhM2S3I7ux7ihJW7Q/q3AtY= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57119 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57119 On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Steinar Bang wrote: >>>>>> Ted Zlatanov : > >> On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, sb@dod.no wrote: > >>> Note that there are two different ways of reporting the spam: >>> - as resends >>> - MIME attachments > >> We'll just add a digest and attachment version of the reporter: > >> (defun spam-report-resend-attachment (&rest articles) >> ...) >> (defun spam-report-resend-digest (&rest articles) >> ...) > > That would make it three different ways. By "resend" I meant what > happens when you do `S D r'. It's what I need for one of my > addresses. That, also, is what I need to do, because... > The difference between resend attachment and resend digest is that > with the latter, the message/rfc822 parts are wrapped inside a > multipart/digest, and the first part should be skipped when unpacking. > I don't know how significant this difference would be for the > unpacking filter...? ...at the moment I don't have an 'unpack' filter, I just deliver to an mbox on the server, and that is then fed whole into the Baysean learning tool. Having to write a filter to extract the message content from a digest before sending it into the learning package would not make me happy. :) Daniel -- The lives of the best of us are spent in choosing between evils. -- Junius