From: "Matt Armstrong" <matt+dated+1007585210.bd118d@lickey.com>
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: Oort releases
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 13:46:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wv15aqtk.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vxkr8rdyob1.fsf@cinnamon.vanillaknot.com> (Karl Kleinpaste's message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:07:14 -0500")
Karl Kleinpaste <karl@charcoal.com> writes:
> Having commented a few moments ago about pGnus releases, it occurs to
> me that Oort is essentially never being updated. That is, Oort has
> been in progress for...well, I'm not sure, but it's well over a year,
> and we've only gotten up to 0.04 so far. I'll grant that Lars' former
> habits of releasing more than once a day at times was perhaps
> excessive, but shouldn't we get a consistent tarball out to folks a
> bit more regularly than we have up to this point? oGnus 0.04 has been
> in existence for months, and there really are people who would like to
> use the under-development branch without cutting the soles of their
> feet on the bleeding edge of daily-CVS' potential hosage.
>
> If Oort isn't actually killing anybody off this week, could we hand
> users a new version, and move on to 0.05?
Yes, I think Gnus is experiencing symptoms of "Lars got a life"
syndrome. It is not as bad as you might think -- the ChangeLog still
shows lots of stuff going on, but the dude who makes releases sure
hasn't been making as many, and I'm not clear on future milestones,
etc. ;-)
--
matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-05 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-05 20:07 Karl Kleinpaste
2001-11-05 20:46 ` Matt Armstrong [this message]
2001-11-05 21:43 ` Bill White
2001-11-06 8:39 ` Kai Großjohann
2001-11-06 9:39 ` Per Abrahamsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wv15aqtk.fsf@squeaker.lickey.com \
--to=matt+dated+1007585210.bd118d@lickey.com \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).