From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38386 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nuutti Kotivuori Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: N versus . for unseen messages Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:51:40 +0300 Message-ID: <87wv3o9703.fsf@smarttrust.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174258 22140 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:24:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:24:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 20645 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2001 03:52:12 -0000 Original-Received: from smtp.dave.sonera.fi (131.177.130.21) by gnus.org with SMTP; 28 Aug 2001 03:52:12 -0000 Original-Received: from kotivnu1-nb.etela.sonera.fi ([131.177.205.219]:32840 "EHLO oro") by inside.dave.sonera.fi with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:51:50 +0300 Original-Received: from naked by oro with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian)) id 15bZui-0000sj-00; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:51:44 +0300 Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Mon, 27 Aug 2001 22:42:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) Original-Lines: 17 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38386 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38386 Kai Großjohann wrote: > Some of my unseen messages are marked `N', some are marked `.'. > It's clear to me that `N' is used only in nnimap groups, but then > why do I sometimes see `.' in nnimap groups? 'N' comes from the IMAP server's recent status, '.' comes from Gnus's idea of what's new and what's not. Apparently these two are running at the same time - and accesses outside Gnus atleast do change the state of both. The user should be able to select which one (or maybe both?) is to be used - since for others the IMAP server status might never be recent and for others it might be the most accurate recent indicator if they use other mailreaders as well. -- Naked