From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36277 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules... Date: 18 May 2001 14:58:25 -0400 Organization: Mind your own business, you silly arthur king! Message-ID: <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171890 7720 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 24574 invoked by alias); 18 May 2001 18:58:27 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 24569 invoked from network); 18 May 2001 18:58:26 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 May 2001 18:58:26 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA07000 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 17 May 2001 20:58:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lowell.missioncriticallinux.com Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 990125892 31795 208.51.139.16 (17 May 2001 18:58:12 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2001 18:58:12 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 17 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36277 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36277 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > Gack. That's bad. Why don't you make a bug report that says that > there should be a variable pointing to the right buffer during > splitting. Or that respooling should also use " *nnmail incoming*". Right, it would make sense to me that the gnus-original-article-buffer variable should be updated during splitting, and set back to the previous value after splitting is done. how does that sound? I'll go submit a bug report now. Maybe I'll look to see where the relevant code is... -- Josh Huber