From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23756 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans de Graaff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: some mail annoyances Date: 04 Jul 1999 08:37:23 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: <87wvwgx6n0.fsf@graaff.xs4all.nl> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161433 3768 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:50:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA18810 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 03:29:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAB23458; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 02:28:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 04 Jul 1999 02:29:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA17155 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 02:25:36 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from graaff.xs4all.nl (qmailr@graaff.xs4all.nl [194.109.62.76]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA18745 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 03:18:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 1095 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Jul 1999 06:37:24 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: ,i^c$X{l+r}VV%(bl{^[ writes: > I'll just include it here; please do suggest changes that will make > things clearer, since this is a quite important subject. It's clear to me, but I would expect it to be clear to most people on this list. What is needed here is some testing on unsuspecting users who don't read mail with Gnus. Perhaps posting it in gnu.emacs.gnus might get you some more useful feeedback. > Gnus, by default, handles all its group using the same approach. s > This approach is very newsreaderly--you enter a group, see the > new/unread messages, and when you read the messages, they get marked as > read, and you don't see them any more. (Unless you explicitly ask for > them.) > I don't mean to scare anybody off, but I want to make it clear that > you may be required to learn a new way of thinking about messages. > After you've been subjected to The Gnus Way, you will come to love it. If you won't trademark The Gnus Way(tm), I think I will. Hans