From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/79436 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F8gren?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Emacs coredump when reading news.gmane.org gwene.com.stackoverflow.blog:138 Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:11:51 +0200 Organization: koldfront - analysis & revolution, Copenhagen, Denmark Message-ID: <87y605p1nc.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310379203 22689 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2011 10:13:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:13:23 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M27732@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Jul 11 12:13:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgDUM-000268-Av for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:13:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QgDTM-0003aB-Nf; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:12:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QgDTI-0003Zn-Tt for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:12:12 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QgDTE-0005dx-NH for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 05:12:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QgDTB-0002eh-Ng for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:12:05 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgDTB-0001TT-4x for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:12:05 +0200 Original-Received: from 2505ds5-by.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.24.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:12:05 +0200 Original-Received: from asjo by 2505ds5-by.0.fullrate.dk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:12:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 92 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 2505ds5-by.0.fullrate.dk Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: )qY&CseJ?.:=8F#^~GcSA?F=9eu'{KAFfL1C3/A&:nE?PW\i65"ba0NS)97,Q(^@xk}n4Ou rPuR#V8I(J_@~H($[ym:`K_+]*kjvW>xH5jbgLBVFGXY:(#4P>zVBklLbdL&XxL\M)%T}3S/IS9lMJ ^St'=VZBR Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:79436 Archived-At: When I display this article from news.gwene.org: Xref: news.gmane.org gwene.com.stackoverflow.blog:138 Message-ID: in: GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.4) of 2011-07-05 on cigue, modified by Debian (emacs-snapshot 1:20110705-1 by Julien Danjou) No Gnus v0.18 (fbfc2ce2, from git) the article is shown, but after a couple of seconds, I get a coredump. Running "gdb emacs core" and typing "bt", I get: $ gdb emacs core GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2-debian [...] Reading symbols from /usr/bin/emacs...(no debugging symbols found)...done. [New Thread 6327] [New Thread 6328] [New Thread 6329] [...] Core was generated by `emacs'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f82feb686e7 in kill () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 82 ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S: No such file or directory. in ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S (gdb) bt #0 0x00007f82feb686e7 in kill () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82 #1 0x00000000004ff4ca in ?? () #2 #3 0x00000000004e8e56 in ?? () #4 0x00000000004e75c8 in ?? () #5 0x00000000004e7916 in ?? () #6 0x000000000057585c in ?? () #7 0x00000000005ada46 in ?? () #8 0x0000000000575319 in ?? () #9 0x000000000057568b in ?? () #10 0x00000000005ada46 in ?? () #11 0x0000000000575319 in ?? () #12 0x000000000057568b in ?? () #13 0x00000000005766b7 in ?? () #14 0x00000000005758cf in ?? () #15 0x00000000005ada46 in ?? () #16 0x0000000000574c8b in ?? () #17 0x0000000000577f14 in ?? () #18 0x00000000005ae389 in ?? () #19 0x0000000000575319 in ?? () #20 0x000000000057568b in ?? () #21 0x0000000000575b0a in ?? () #22 0x000000000050591e in ?? () #23 0x0000000000505c49 in ?? () #24 0x0000000000507f65 in ?? () #25 0x000000000050a68a in ?? () #26 0x00000000005b3ede in ?? () #27 0x0000000000421954 in ?? () #28 0x000000000050c999 in ?? () #29 0x000000000050d6fd in ?? () #30 0x000000000050f3b7 in ?? () #31 0x0000000000573983 in ?? () #32 0x000000000050259e in ?? () #33 0x0000000000573858 in ?? () #34 0x0000000000503aff in ?? () #35 0x0000000000503e37 in ?? () #36 0x0000000000416d4d in ?? () #37 0x00007f82feb54ead in __libc_start_main (main=, argc=, ubp_av=, init=, fini=, rtld_fini=, stack_end=0x7fff4f5093d8) at libc-start.c:228 #38 0x0000000000417945 in ?? () #39 0x00007fff4f5093d8 in ?? () #40 0x000000000000001c in ?? () ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #41 0x0000000000000001 in ?? () #42 0x00007fff4f50b567 in ?? () #43 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) which, I'm afraid, doesn't say much...? Can anyone reproduce this crash? Best regards, Adam -- "Most people dismiss such thinking as 'impractical' Adam Sjøgren and 'unrealistic.' I think most people are being asjo@koldfront.dk unimaginative."