From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78304 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Sullivan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: IMAP and IDLE... Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:11:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87y63ttvmg.fsf@myles.home.wjsullivan.net> References: <8739mmvmso.fsf@myles.home.wjsullivan.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301767476 27147 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2011 18:04:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 18:04:36 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26613@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Apr 02 20:04:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q65BV-0002Z0-33 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:04:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q65AM-0005Ns-7n; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 13:03:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q65AL-0005NJ-1o for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 13:03:17 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q65A2-00023U-Ow for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 13:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q65A2-0006Pr-4U for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 20:02:58 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5oNx-0003hy-Tu for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:08:13 +0200 Original-Received: from c-76-24-9-131.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([76.24.9.131]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:08:13 +0200 Original-Received: from john by c-76-24-9-131.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 02:08:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-24-9-131.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OJ+aJ8xielf3NegKDl9xoJewqa0= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78304 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > James Cloos writes: > >> If you run g, wait for some new mail to arrive, and only then enter the >> group, the new mail does not show. But, I bet, that unseen mail still >> gets marked read (or otherwise modified) when you exit the group. And >> thus appears to gnus to be old the next time you enter that group. > > It's possible... but Gnus only sends the marks delta to the server, so > if Gnus doesn't know about message X, it won't send any data to the > server about message X. > > I think. That sounds like a credible explanation, but on the other hand, when I've tried to reproduce it that way, I can't. I can definitely say that not *all* of the unseen mail gets marked read that way.