From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75788 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leonidas Tsampros Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:00:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87y66dorn8.fsf@bifteki.lan> References: <87y66d5b7e.fsf@bifteki.lan> <877hdx814k.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1295712061 12109 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2011 16:01:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:01:01 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M24138@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Jan 22 17:00:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PgftP-0000qV-VZ for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:00:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PgftI-0000se-0v; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:00:40 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PgftG-0000sU-EC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:00:38 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pgft0-0007ku-Ry for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:00:38 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pgfsz-0002sP-Tw for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:00:22 +0100 Original-Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so2848612wyf.17 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:00:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:from:to:subject:references :mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=qN73GI+8UPUJO9ob25sqh7Cs6puVpg+iw2jdWH9f56M=; b=CYDk8tfGjAGvF+u96ESbUoKTwIhEWF+dzFMV1q0R667k0EPexBNisq4WyxGm7Gdaso Hz3//YdUlfYKHDK7uCCtI7+dTkF38kbGr+vBcZj587SbtFtFS/JdFisqtzBOf7C7v/JE KGpQq6P1obHU4J01vfruO/NO5z0Cy7ngGOY/w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=ZUHucdibV9Zssu34o9DiKQlHHD7qKEFyn152GnFGYQIApf8sP1Y3TMnLwvAFr+onLd ey+4g2QLRKajluxvar5ONlPePx+uWl/nrg4WjeiHV1pVboqJeleJAegBLRiL/XEjlfO5 kAdlK9BGKRfO98sugX4S6tr1qjFlep+oGQCEo= Original-Received: by 10.227.144.131 with SMTP id z3mr2255452wbu.198.1295712015325; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:00:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bifteki.lan (193.92.224.225.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [193.92.224.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r6sm5551334weq.44.2011.01.22.08.00.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 22 Jan 2011 08:00:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from ltsampros-ferrari-one-200 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bifteki.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id E856C64A20E for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 18:00:11 +0200 (EET) Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <877hdx814k.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (Reiner Steib's message of "Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:27:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75788 Archived-At: Reiner Steib writes: > On Sat, Jan 22 2011, Leonidas Tsampros wrote: > >> I was bitten by the default value of this variable >> (rmail-default-dont-reply-to-names) recently while subscribed to the >> info-gnus-english mailing list. >> >> While, it's okay for me since now I have set it to nil permanently in my >> .gnus, do you think it's a good idea to document this variable in the >> info manual or even change it's default value to nil? Does it even make >> sense to ignore all the info- addresses by default in 2011? >> >> I know that this is not part of the Gnus package but it's in rmail, > > Please report it as a bug in Emacs (Rmail). M-x report-emacs-bug RET. Done! > See / > . Thanks for the link. Although I googled it, I didn't stumble upon that thread. Just a remark, since Gnus is a consumer of 'rmail-dont-reply-to', maybe the bug above won't stand a chance of getting fixed/accepted by the Emacs people. If 'rmail-dont-reply-to' doesn't work or behave to our liking we would be better off: 1) either documenting it 2) or/and doing what the thread above suggests What do you think? >> but since Gnus use this part, I thought it would be a good idea to >> ask here first before submitting anything. > > Bye, Reiner. Thanks, Leonidas