From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71800 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nils Ackermann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Any juicy outstanding Gnus bugs? Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:38:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87y6apxm8x.fsf@thysbe.fqdn.ackermath.info> References: <877hi9z277.fsf@thysbe.fqdn.ackermath.info> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285468773 31621 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2010 02:39:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:39:33 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M20173@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 26 04:39:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozh9H-0001DD-K7 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:39:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozh8p-0002xU-BW; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozh8n-0002xH-8Q for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:39:01 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ozh8i-0006RI-Bv for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:39:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.geekisp.com ([216.168.135.169] helo=starfish.geekisp.com) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ozh8h-00068P-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:38:55 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5510 invoked by uid 1003); 26 Sep 2010 02:38:24 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=ackermath.info; b=T837c2StJS4OXiaU5B1MEY2Sir771tt33v9KU/cDTitafBB/mlpqlljLXm8r5dqPfKE7Rj5Zd3PcSAMdkf1CVX+viKDm0AXhK7S1kbm3xADwAJBJ6rhbg+phmox/w1c8 ; Original-Received: from dsl-201-124-5-140-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx (HELO thysbe.localdomain) (nils@nieback.info@201.124.5.140) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 26 Sep 2010 02:38:24 -0000 Original-Received: by thysbe.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 508A6E5A43; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:38:22 -0500 (CDT) Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:16:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-790--1459h-0s--0d--H*M:fsf, 0.000-684--1264h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-669--1236h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-646--1193h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-646--1193h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux Spam tokens: 0.881-308--889h-19543s--0d--H*Ad:D*gnus.org, 0.873-266--1066h-21742s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.873-266--1066h-21742s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org, 0.863-167--1113h-20900s--0d--HTo:D*gnus.org, 0.857-28--298h-5309s--0d--H*Ad:U*ding Autolearn status: no 2.2 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY RBL: NJABL: sender is an open proxy [201.124.5.140 listed in combined.njabl.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS BODY: T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.0 T_MIME_NO_TEXT No text body parts List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71800 Archived-At: --=-=-= Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Could you give a summary of how the bug displays itself now, and send > backtraces etc? Using a clean slate and the .gnus file --=-=-= Content-Type: application/emacs-lisp Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=gnus-testconf.el Content-Description: dot gnus for testing (setq gnus-select-method '(nnnil "")) (setq nnml-get-new-mail nil) (setq nnml-directory "~/Mail/nnml") (setq nnml-active-file "~/Mail/nnml/active") (setq nnml-inhibit-expiry t) (setq gnus-secondary-select-methods '((nnml "") )) (setq nnmail-expiry-target "nnml:archive") (setq gnus-message-archive-group "nnml:archive") (setq gnus-parameters '(("nndraft:drafts" (expiry-target . delete)))) --=-=-= do the following: Write email, save it, send it. Do it again. Second time gives error: `Selecting deleted buffer'. Expectation would be no error, because overriding expiry-target in drafts group parameters. Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Selecting deleted buffer") nnml-add-nov("archive" 6 [nil "test 4" "Gnus Test " "Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:26:11 -0500" "<81sk0x9r5m.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id>" nil 0 0 "thysbe.fqdn.ackermath.info archive:6" ((To . "nils"))]) nnml-save-mail((("archive" . 6)) "" t) nnml-request-accept-article("archive" "" nil) gnus-request-accept-article("nnml:archive" nil nil t) nnmail-expiry-target-group("nnml:archive" "drafts") nnmh-request-expire-articles((4) "drafts" nil t) apply(nnmh-request-expire-articles ((4) "drafts" nil t)) nnoo-parent-function(nndraft nnmh-request-expire-articles ((4) "drafts" nil t)) nndraft-request-expire-articles((4) "drafts" nil t) message-disassociate-draft() message-send(nil) message-send-and-exit(nil) call-interactively(message-send-and-exit nil nil) The upshot is: setting an nnml archive group as expiry target globally and (expiry-target . delete) for the draft group (which is the default) does not work for saved drafts. After sending a saved article from the drafts group gnus attempts to expire twice instead of simply deleting the article. Cheers, Nils --=-=-=--