From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/68805 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: gnus-summary-edit-article vs. Unicode Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:54:24 +0200 Message-ID: <87y6qgsg4f.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> References: <87ocrdt9m1.fsf@jidanni.org> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248288886 24059 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2009 18:54:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M17225@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Jul 22 20:54:39 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MTgxb-0003Yd-6O for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:54:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MTgxV-0008CH-Q3; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:54:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MTgxU-0008Bx-Fg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MTgxT-0006dW-8a for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de ([134.60.1.11]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1MTgy1-0005XS-00 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:55:05 +0200 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.175]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n6MIsTiY024081; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:54:29 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A03138FC; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:54:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: mtjf/D:es1T0wHO:&CJ'ZXe"l;3C--rw\z!{`eFwL){|]RpI+4{u25L=5C /0>KuGeTsk<~<&NE-AKV1560e!+RJeyWmSskkrJm?[vUV#66{T_m|Ae<||Ku#Mk5`y&O`n~z2;n8eP J5#2h@2eQgV@E70IY_0WlEx!"&giy{+\%h1LJox$zv@/l%ZmU4^tZA>xQpnkUBVC5.jpg#0'(+2?Rs )NAr:>3<=WxHE$ktbLysDIM5TbmHu*3 (jidanni@jidanni.org's message of "Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:17:26 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-SIHOPE-DCC-3-Metrics: triton 1085; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:68805 Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 22 2009, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote: > e runs the command gnus-summary-edit-article In a draft summary buffer, `e' runs `gnus-draft-edit-message'. > But when used on a Draft, Chinese characters present become \333. > It is much safer to use > D e which runs the command gnus-draft-edit-message ... only in a draft summary buffer. So I'm not sure if I understand what you mean. Anyhow, if M-x gnus-summary-edit-article RET results in broken messages (even in a draft group), it is a bug. Please give a complete reproducible test case. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/