* `s' and `q' takes a long time
@ 2005-05-17 20:21 Steinar Bang
2005-05-18 19:20 ` Jonas Steverud
2005-05-19 16:23 ` Maciej Matysiak
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steinar Bang @ 2005-05-17 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
Both the Group buffer command `s' (which saves .newsrc.eld and
.gnus.registry.eld) and `q' (which saves the same two files and exits
Gnus) takes a long time for me on today's CVS version of Gnus.
Is this expected behaviour? I upgraded from a January 14 CVS
chekcout, where I didn't see this. It's like it does a lot of
calculation before saving.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: `s' and `q' takes a long time
2005-05-17 20:21 `s' and `q' takes a long time Steinar Bang
@ 2005-05-18 19:20 ` Jonas Steverud
2005-05-31 17:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
2005-05-19 16:23 ` Maciej Matysiak
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonas Steverud @ 2005-05-18 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
> Is this expected behaviour? I upgraded from a January 14 CVS
> chekcout, where I didn't see this. It's like it does a lot of
> calculation before saving.
This is also the case for NGnus 0.3, I've haven't tried 'q' yet but
's' takes 2-5 seconds before any messages about adding whitespace in
the registry or saving .newsrc.eld are shown.
--
( http://hem.bredband.net/steverud/ ! Wei Wu Wei )
( Meaning of U2 Lyrics, Roleplaying ! To Do Without Do )
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: `s' and `q' takes a long time
2005-05-17 20:21 `s' and `q' takes a long time Steinar Bang
2005-05-18 19:20 ` Jonas Steverud
@ 2005-05-19 16:23 ` Maciej Matysiak
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Matysiak @ 2005-05-19 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
On the 17th of May 2005 at 22:21, Steinar Bang <sb#dod.no> wrote:
> Both the Group buffer command `s' (which saves .newsrc.eld and
> .gnus.registry.eld) and `q' (which saves the same two files and exits
> Gnus) takes a long time for me on today's CVS version of Gnus.
I've just updated my quite old cvs gnus and I have to say that this fresh
one is much much faster here - summary generation, displaying articles,
moving articles, saving newsrc.eld, ...
On the other hand, it may be just the effect of starting gnus again after
its few weeks uptime. I have strange feeling that it gets slower and slower
after some time.
Ah, I don't use gnus-registry.
m.m.
--
use gnus, not guns!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: `s' and `q' takes a long time
2005-05-18 19:20 ` Jonas Steverud
@ 2005-05-31 17:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2005-05-31 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wed, 18 May 2005, tvrud@bredband.net wrote:
> Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
>
>> Is this expected behaviour? I upgraded from a January 14 CVS
>> chekcout, where I didn't see this. It's like it does a lot of
>> calculation before saving.
>
> This is also the case for NGnus 0.3, I've haven't tried 'q' yet but
> 's' takes 2-5 seconds before any messages about adding whitespace in
> the registry or saving .newsrc.eld are shown.
[back from vacation]
You can explicitly save the registry with
M-: (gnus-registry-save t)
and see if that's slow. If so, you can trim it with
gnus-registry-max-entries and gnus-registry-ignored-groups.
I know I should really write docs for the gnus-registry.el package.
I've just been too busy to do it.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-31 17:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-17 20:21 `s' and `q' takes a long time Steinar Bang
2005-05-18 19:20 ` Jonas Steverud
2005-05-31 17:01 ` Ted Zlatanov
2005-05-19 16:23 ` Maciej Matysiak
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).