From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37588 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: recent message.el quote changes. Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 23:10:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87y9ovshio.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172975 14624 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:02:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 15559 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2001 20:52:03 -0000 Original-Received: from mail.s.netic.de (HELO mail.netic.de) (212.9.160.11) by gnus.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2001 20:52:03 -0000 Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.111/mail.s.netic.de) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.163.54 via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp for mail.gnus.org id m15UDpa-001X13C; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 22:52:02 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de ident=exim) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15UDpB-0000iH-00 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2001 22:51:37 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15UE7b-0000Jr-00 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2001 23:10:39 +0200 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Tue, 07 Aug 2001 18:31:03 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 17 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37588 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37588 Simon Josefsson writes: > The recent changes aren't perfect, I've seen a few versions of the > following in just 2-3 days. Original text: > > ,---- > | >I think some servers MIME parse messages and store them in another > | >equivalent format somehow, and when clients requests RFC822-messages > | >it reconstructs MIME delimiters and MIME headers. All the > | information > | >is there, but since the signature was calculated over the first MIME > | >delimiters/headers the reconstruction often breaks the signature. > `---- I think I'm going to write a comb quoting detector and restorer. BTW, does Outlook always use '>' and never '> '?