From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36295 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules... Date: 21 May 2001 14:15:45 -0400 Organization: Mind your own business, you silly arthur king! Message-ID: <87y9rqo9fp.fsf@mclinux.com> References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> <871ypi7q10.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171904 7849 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:45:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 12577 invoked by alias); 21 May 2001 18:15:48 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 12572 invoked from network); 21 May 2001 18:15:47 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 21 May 2001 18:15:47 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA11232 for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 20 May 2001 20:15:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lowell.missioncriticallinux.com Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 990382532 28505 208.51.139.16 (20 May 2001 18:15:32 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 May 2001 18:15:32 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 23 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36295 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36295 Simon Josefsson writes: > > Should it copy the message into nnmail-incoming-buffer beforehand? > > Yes, and looking at the code it looks like it does, but maybe I'm > reading it wrong. The article would be in g-o-a-b as well. Well, I just tried it again and the buffer < *nnmail incoming*> doesn't even exist during re-spooling. so, my workaround is this: (if (get-buffer " *nnmail incoming*") (set-buffer " *nnmail incoming*") (set-buffer " *Original Article*")) which would work, I guess, but the introduction of nnmail-incoming-buffer would be ideal :) ttyl, -- Josh Huber