From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36279 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Josh Huber Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: more on accessing the body via split rules... Date: 18 May 2001 16:35:07 -0400 Organization: Mind your own business, you silly arthur king! Message-ID: <87y9rutmys.fsf@mclinux.com> References: <87r8xmg02v.fsf@mclinux.com> <87d796d5xw.fsf@mclinux.com> <878zjud3cs.fsf@mclinux.com> <87wv7e7acu.fsf@mclinux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171891 7729 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:44:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 25853 invoked by alias); 18 May 2001 20:35:08 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 25848 invoked from network); 18 May 2001 20:35:08 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139) by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 May 2001 20:35:08 -0000 Original-Received: (from news@localhost) by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA03896 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 17 May 2001 22:34:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: lowell.missioncriticallinux.com Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 990131694 12392 208.51.139.16 (17 May 2001 20:34:54 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 May 2001 20:34:54 GMT X-Go-Away: or I shall taunt you a second time! X-PGP-KeyID: 6B21489A X-PGP-CertKey: 61F0 6138 BE7B FEBF A223 E9D1 BFE1 2065 6B21 489A X-Request-PGP: finger:huber@db.debian.org Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36279 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36279 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes: > I think that's not the right buffer, for gnus-original-article-buffer > is used when _displaying_ a message, not during splitting. That is, > if you look at the *Article* buffer then you see a munged copy of the > contents of the original article buffer. > > Maybe introduce a new variable nnmail-original-message-buffer? Ok we could do that. I just submitted a bug report, but like you said it probably would be better to just to nnmail-original-message-buffer. I included a diff to nnmail.el in the report... where do those reports go? to this list? -- Josh Huber