From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/31520
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Sync two ~/Mail directories on Windows?
Date: 24 Jun 2000 23:32:56 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <87ya3ukbnb.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <vafem5pl5mu.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m31z1p464u.fsf@peorth.rgo.gweep.net>
	<vafd7l8efbu.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035167922 14591 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:38:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:38:42 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1588FD0523
	for <jason@mailhost.sclp.com>; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:29:48 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAC25972;
	Sun, 25 Jun 2000 02:29:39 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 25 Jun 2000 02:28:55 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA27703
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 02:28:43 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mail.netic.de (mail.s.netic.de [212.9.160.11])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29DCD0521
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 03:29:15 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: by mail.netic.de (Smail3.2.0.106/mail.s.netic.de)
	via LF.net GmbH Internet Services
	via remoteip 212.9.163.95
	via remotehost mail.enyo.de with esmtp
	for mailhost.sclp.com
	id m1366qp-001X3yC; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:29:07 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de)
	by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 1366qO-00009P-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2000 09:28:40 +0200
Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 135xXs-0000xM-00
	for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:32:56 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:45:25 +0200"
Original-Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31520
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:31520

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:

> Thanks a lot.  What's the best way to access the remote directory?
> Using rshd or sshd on Windows?  Or is it better/easier to just mount
> the other directory via SMB or NFS and then call rsync with two local
> directory names?

If you do the actual transfer inside your LAN, I would use a SMB
mount. rshd and sshd aren't worth the trouble in this case.  Neither
the bandwidth-conserving aspect of the rsync protocol (when compared
to SMB) nor the added security by the use of SSH are important.