From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9046 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2022 16:16:19 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Sep 2022 16:16:19 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1oblLe-008wp2-Bh for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:16:18 -0500 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oblLe-001Prk-0D for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:16:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oblLb-001Pre-1r for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:16:15 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1oblLX-008woK-3M for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:16:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Reply-To:Sender:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=roh5K8I4s8VSyO3zoyKh1fPbPSg3Nh+4aVVw2M0laMA=; b=MhExslW+naQ6A/iJmeSYJHe0aI fPVcVWJlQibVlMtxqB44jKduI6sBcnIunNaAor9k5sLoVZSG4C5NYuDnBf+o6fwzpl2tO4QgGhFe0 vwMyXiuEcfKx3aZPEmH2pfbVG6DW1YSgN267mq1o8iHDWM6xcFP7Y8IOJLn2QS/k3JU0=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oblLP-0003TI-Ok for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:16:05 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oblLO-00034m-1b for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:16:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Reply-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Robert Pluim Subject: Re: why are sent buffers not burried. Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:15:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgeq9idg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zgeqaxc9.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cancel-Lock: sha1:3Wc3aX0QsVU7j++LJn+gwxiuSWw= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk >>>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:07:18 +0200, Uwe Brauer said: Uwe> Hi Uwe> When I run ibuffer (or buffer list), I see Uwe> *sent wide repl... 1125 Message ~/News/drafts/drafts/55 Uwe> Why aren't these buffers burried after sending. I mean keeping them Uwe> might be useful in some scenarios but in general it might be annoying. Uwe> Is there any variable that controls that? message-kill-buffer-on-exit is a variable defined in `message.el'. Its value is t Original value was nil Non-nil means that the message buffer will be killed after sending a message. Robert --