From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 4666 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2021 13:30:50 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 10 Apr 2021 13:30:50 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDhH-00GMl1-2M for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 08:30:47 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDhG-006nth-Fq for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 08:30:46 -0500 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDhE-006ntY-BX for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 08:30:44 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDhA-00G6uy-Sg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 08:30:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ydf06ZBH/LFECvOl2RmYS+PArTuaccoMIe3WTuM79Kw=; b=P7XMFgBLbtU9vk2qoKMb1ZwYsh 3/cwx4qlJVoG8s3FIQLcFMNmJeD7Tt/Bn5yK4GHKfsPzUEYnfX87a4qe1DX7kKoV93GBX1Q82iv0I MYt/cFL122Xn4vXBtCa1GH64P1PCefqepE1kzsVx2hxfc53DrK6ilLUEHIiN/aD6yZxA=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDgt-0004c9-Ur for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:30:36 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lVDgs-0003zy-Mt for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:30:22 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org To: ding@gnus.org From: Emanuel Berg Subject: Re: spam-split of spam.el with bsfilter Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 15:30:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgy6fes6.fsf@zoho.eu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:w9pIvU4/JvSf6wUN/usjhoaqqks= Mail-Copies-To: never List-ID: Precedence: bulk Hirotaka Honda wrote: > spam-split function began to work after putting the name of > the spam folder also in the argument of the function. > > (: spam-split "mail.spam") ;; "mail.spam" ^^ (that should be just one ; BTW - as in ;) OT: do you guys really get that much spam? I think I have used mail since ~1996 and never, ever had a problem with spam! And I even put my mail in mailto:s all over the place - see https://dataswamp.org/~incal and even more so https://dataswamp.org/~incal/blog and in text files like this https://dataswamp.org/~incal/data/MM What am I doing wrong? Please tell me! Or are you doing anti-spam for the sake of it? Or for some application/setting that is so much LARGER than small poor ol' me? ? > Hirotaka Honda > Honda Law Office > ParkAxis ShibuyaSakuragaoka South 801 > 8-11 Sakuragaokacho, Shibuya-Ku > Tokyo 150-0031 Japan > Tel +81 3 3463 6602 Fax +81 3 3463 6608 > http://www.hondalaw.com ... and, speaking about signature, please read this RFC 3676, section 4.3 (Usenet Signature Convention) https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3676.txt :) -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal