From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7075 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2021 21:45:48 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 12 Feb 2021 21:45:48 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lAgFz-00FjbA-4j for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:45:43 -0600 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lAgFy-00CFed-IL for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:45:42 -0600 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lAgFx-00CFeX-GN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:45:41 -0600 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lAgFv-00Fa8t-MX for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:45:41 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To: Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Sy0sH5ZoLe/05KB5y2IEVSBb/d7tsCPTqhX7ZdLzv7A=; b=L1gdgeZV805RUZA/I0HxdeTd+N YlMPUH0XkzLEkW43YtG3jDDwytrAn4bDdIofNXkEPKgcvtLRLNK8e36I2WZOIkdKIMS3RI+V/NCXR xjbpXxOSYbauJdM7MMZh0QLz4jjpsieRvVVqWrsF5n35EK+OwPpnXxIeOhz09fL1HEKk=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAgFl-0003Sv-H6 for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 22:45:34 +0100 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lAgFk-0001Rc-BR for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 22:45:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ding@gnus.org From: reader Subject: Any one here who has mastered placing groups as disired in topic mode Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:45:17 -0500 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: <87zh09gdua.fsf@local.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JrsKfQfgxYk5xpy1glZ1UqY8JWY= List-ID: Precedence: bulk I've always had trouble making Topic groups showup where I want them. Seems like you should be able to goto a tgroup where you want the new one to be under it... place cursor just under that tgroup then create the new one. Having it appear just under right where you cursor was. Or at least some other method the works consistently: In the enclosed groups screen ------- ------- ---=--- ------- ------- [ Gnus -- 401598 ] [ nnml -- 212 ] 1: nnml:jtan.keep 1: nnml:amazon 30: nnml:zfs-discuss 1: nnml:synchronybnk 3: nnml:optumrx 106: nnml:oi-discuss 3: nnml:greystone_tr 2: nnml:all-but-cron_ [ archive -- 16 ] [ mail -- 6 ]... [ news -- 10 ]... [ proc-spamrel -- 49 ]... ------- ------- ---=--- ------- ------- I'd like the last one showing (proc-spamrel) to appear just below and one level lower than `nnml'. But you see where it appears if I start just below nnml and create that tgroup. True enough that it is one step lower than `nnml' but how to make it show up right below the list when `nnml' is unraveled? Just below `nnml:all-but-cron' in the group screen above. Seems I could remove `archive' temporarily then create `proc-spamrel' but when there are more groups on the same level as `archive' seems like it would be easy to do more harm than good like risk loosing a tgroup. Can anyone share some tips on how to get tgroups where you want them. I know about T-tab but it seems to have the same effect. If I create `proc-spamrel' on the same level as `nnml' then T-tab one level down it still ends up in the same position as shown above. I've used Topic mode for quite a long time so have tried many things never hitting on something very handy. Currently I'm trying to recreate a Topic look and placement that I totally destroyed a while ago. So there is quite a bit of fiddling to do.