From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86806 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus cleanup Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:35:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87zivauvr6.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87h9hied21.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455006944 6749 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2016 08:35:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:35:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 09 09:35:35 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aT3lm-0004Uz-Pm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:35:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53159 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT3lm-0001L3-BL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:35:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT3lU-0001GU-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:35:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT3lQ-0007r2-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:35:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:64930) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aT3lP-0007qj-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.41.147]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ljqgb-1ZrG6R33px-00bq6S; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:35:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h9hied21.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:13:26 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:pQ+am4ekf0Fs2ZFUBZCNdGevPsxV4YIK57dD+ZhbjsClLLH713B YBwxO6/EkK9HljcgJ2kjzbd+D38reUM4x8+U5HnQSbEOJXHi8ZLC5OhtWfb1AYUu2WGKVNt KeYlPTmONs4Ga3GM1T/HAfXpSbuF1yjsS8fSNjDVsBEfclqt73rT6yuwTCm9UKiiny+iunL 68AuEKe/PoOvnvnM3h/Dw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:NAlvk7QOVyM=:iJCDU+nE0mfpyjRxzbJqfy IkDoNfMV8i/nkydExvtFphqE3A/HZJoXQfhVoLMhOB/0pq8S8s9us4jOFFRVWlNv85MT3L2Yg vhtvG9zzEeibi6iWGMvFviR+vFpB0OIPX8otmgHjMc/PBompDp9/OyOGBCP0x1A9VAdUrW8HB JTcx+uNfTpCbu+2/CEqLoVROppe8mWHzKg1rBD1IPQk1vkxkbfhzoqDw6WFCJJsU+ii4DNXSH V3evA3Jbeq/6vsR7nYSepqidiDcDlUQt+hIeF/aS3pZCvVQSRDO0vAULCHyjfi2/k3lbjY6Ys X1I1piNCZ1ahxhQg08Ziltp3IVvMXECldbvr23lP0WDCWdSBcisE8WXe36/7PoT2ac3V/t4hr IjOS2m4ZWRqzmAsNmjSrT7EVBYtHBQdcuxmSaXwTTZ5bDZiUM7q0l1+kBcJC0X1oyKu1O4aIq ouoTDDjAGEmXbJr4CbyHi1X8Y2I2lszmv7rKSzuffQi73ieF8/gitTKQHj75psykNlzjfFqxp 9MnX0jcFLjkz3+lhtzyJhcMIQihT1JrCYVMCk9cqLYsiTK/bVsbNB7PvPYrnacJseoxfJAb/K qLi2fAaUkwHh1MIn5VKOyke+HxS6xNIeGrjkyOac56Dzef7NXyHDxjMVm78JIw3u3uz3H3+XY W5NB0PJIrUvbW+3P2vXGIzrrKy1E7BU/PGqGFetwjyi7mlFgD42rEqR48HumB/o8xD0WU/Nk0 Yq4aqdG8+Ae4k3o3bnd2BoR+Lu8HywBLB/KLdtHF3nRmsQG0lwLtbEbdrichO2nteymDFE8O X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199580 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86806 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: Hi Lars, > So I could just remove the compat function to. But it is theoretically > feasible that somebody out there are calling > gnus-window-inside-pixel-edges in their own code. > > So... just mark the compat functions as obsolete, or nuke them? In Tramp, I have nuked all compat functions some weeks ago. One user had to change the call of tramp-compat-split-string to split-string, that's all what I've heard. But maybe there's a horde of users out there, willing to beat me when I show up ... Best regards, Michael.