Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>
>> Dan Christensen <jdc@uwo.ca> writes:
>>
>>> I tried these two one-line patches, and they allowed me to use nnmairix
>>> again, although it wasn't smooth.
>
> [...]
>
>> This patch might offer the right solution: the group creation process
>> sets the subscription level for the new group. This triggers all the
>> necessary processes (I think) to get the group noticed by Gnus, so it
>> doesn't trigger errors or require you to manually enter it.
>
> [...]
>
> I tried your patch after unapplying Bjøjn Mork's patch, and I got the 
> same backtrace as usual, due to a nil value getting passed in.  See
> below.
>
> Then I tried applying both your patch and Mork's patch, and didn't see
> any difference in behaviour compared to Mork's patch alone.  I even
> deleted the imap group that nnmairix uses for its storage, in the hopes
> that this would cause your new code to run, and still saw no change.
> I had to manually subscribe to the group and refresh it before the
> nnmairix group could be entered.
>
> Thanks for the help so far!

Ha, well that was a bust, wasn't it? Turns out there were multiple
issues here -- the patch I sent fixed group creation via moving
messages, but nnmairix calls `nnimap-request-group' with INFO set to
nil, so Bjørn's solution was still necessary. I've made some more
adjustments to the group creation process, which I hope won't mess
anything else up. Would you mind trying these two patches?

Thanks,
Eric