Re: What condition triggers to ham-process-destination ?

[Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@gnu.org>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> The messages in the Junk folder have to be marked as ham.  This is
> controlled by the ham-marks group parameter, and you can check with
> (gnus-parameter-ham-marks "groupname").  You can set them as group/topic
> parameters; e.g. use `G p' on your top-level topic and set:
>
>  (ham-marks (gnus-ticked-mark))
>
> (if this is the only parameter, meaning you only see a nil, you need to
> wrap it in extra parentheses)

> Now, every time you tick a spam article, it will be moved out of the
> spam group for ham training when you exit.

Thanks, now everything works!

I was a bit mislead by the info section "8.20.1 Spam Package
Introduction" telling me to just "unmark" (as I did by using 'M-u'):

| Similarly, you can unmark an article if it has been erroneously marked
| as spam. See Setting Marks.

It might help avoid confusion, if that sentence would be more explicit
to say that not only should the spam-mark be removed, but also a mark
has to be set which is contained in the `ham-marks` set.


Btw, what is the recommended way to set up an "unsure" emailfolder,
i.e. a folder which gets emails which bogofilter (in tristate mode) was
/unsure/ about whether it's spam or ham?

cheers,
  hvr
--