From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/81560 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Herbert Valerio Riedel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: What condition triggers to ham-process-destination ? Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:38:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87zkbntfyn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87aa3rfna0.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqckzjip.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331473198 15408 80.91.229.3 (11 Mar 2012 13:39:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 13:39:58 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M29840@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Mar 11 14:39:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S6j08-0006y4-EB for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:39:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S6izH-0000NI-Ro; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S6izG-0000N8-PD for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S6izF-0001Qr-GW for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10] ident=Debian-exim) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S6izD-0007kt-Nz for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:38:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42890 helo=duo.localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S6izC-0001sb-2q for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:38:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pqckzjip.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:13:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130003 (Ma Gnus v0.3) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:81560 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > The messages in the Junk folder have to be marked as ham. This is > controlled by the ham-marks group parameter, and you can check with > (gnus-parameter-ham-marks "groupname"). You can set them as group/topic > parameters; e.g. use `G p' on your top-level topic and set: > > (ham-marks (gnus-ticked-mark)) > > (if this is the only parameter, meaning you only see a nil, you need to > wrap it in extra parentheses) > Now, every time you tick a spam article, it will be moved out of the > spam group for ham training when you exit. Thanks, now everything works! I was a bit mislead by the info section "8.20.1 Spam Package Introduction" telling me to just "unmark" (as I did by using 'M-u'): | Similarly, you can unmark an article if it has been erroneously marked | as spam. See Setting Marks. It might help avoid confusion, if that sentence would be more explicit to say that not only should the spam-mark be removed, but also a mark has to be set which is contained in the `ham-marks` set. Btw, what is the recommended way to set up an "unsure" emailfolder, i.e. a folder which gets emails which bogofilter (in tristate mode) was /unsure/ about whether it's spam or ham? cheers, hvr --