From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76839 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Incoming IMAP split problem Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:42:30 -0800 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: <87zkpvpsft.fsf@gnus.org> References: <871v38c5jt.fsf@maru.md5i.com> <87tyg4aql8.fsf@maru.md5i.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297892573 7944 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2011 21:42:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:42:53 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25178@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 16 22:42:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppp97-0002dU-Fy for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:42:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppp91-0001Wn-Ib; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:42:43 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppp8z-0001WS-SA for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:42:41 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppp8u-0006oH-RR for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:42:40 -0600 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppp8s-0001XZ-Ld for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:42:34 +0100 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ppp8s-0002SO-Cq for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:42:34 +0100 Original-Received: from baybryj.net ([198.144.208.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:42:34 +0100 Original-Received: from larsi by baybryj.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:42:34 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 36 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: baybryj.net Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WM/Xa5ZWSCG/agBx3EbdN8QEbqM= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76839 Archived-At: Michael Welsh Duggan writes: >> Here's a portion of an IMAP split log that looks fishy: >> >> 11:18:36 882 SELECT "INBOX" >> 11:18:36 883 UID FETCH 1:* FLAGS >> 11:18:36 884 UID FETCH 25439:25440 (UID BODY.PEEK[HEADER] BODY.PEEK[1]) >> 11:18:36 885 UID COPY 25440 "INBOX/sei" >> 11:18:36 886 UID STORE 25439 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) >> 11:18:36 887 EXPUNGE >> >> Why is it copying 25440 (correctly), and then deleting 25439 (which I >> didn't see)? Am I losing mail? If you have a 'junk split, then than means that Gnus will just delete the message, and I think that's what you're seeing. So, yes, you're losing mail. The 'junk mail. > Here's another example. In this case I was able to verify that the two > deleted messages were properly deleted (split to 'junk). > > 11:28:36 976 SELECT "INBOX" > 11:28:36 977 UID FETCH 1:* FLAGS > 11:28:36 978 UID FETCH 25441:25444 (UID BODY.PEEK[HEADER] BODY.PEEK[1]) > 11:28:36 979 UID COPY 25441:25442 "INBOX/misc" > 11:28:37 980 UID STORE 25443:25444 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted) > 11:28:37 981 EXPUNGE Looks like the same thing here? 25443:25444 are 'junk articles? But I don't understand why 25441:25442 aren't deleted, too. I mean, they've been split to other mailboxes, so they should be removed from INBOX, shouldn't they? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen