From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71304 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: More IMAP testing, please Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:13:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87zkvb58aj.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <87ocbsuu51.fsf@andy.bu.edu> <878w2v849u.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285089267 6511 80.91.229.12 (21 Sep 2010 17:14:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:14:27 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19677@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Sep 21 19:14:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy6QD-0001ZO-Cq for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:14:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy6Q9-0002Vj-DD; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:14:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy6Q8-0002VS-0s for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy6Q6-0006JI-BC for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:14:19 -0500 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174] helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Oy6Q5-0007yG-00 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:14:17 +0200 Original-Received: by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id 010DE5C111; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:13:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on prometheus.naquadah.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e39:e900:222:faff:fe9d:ce44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 928445C0FB for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:13:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from jd by keller.adm.naquadah.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy6PY-0001ti-1I for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 19:13:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:40:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71304 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 21 2010, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Do all the common servers implement "UID SEARCH SENTBEFORE", and is it > usable? That is, is it fast enough to actually be used? I don't know if all server implements it, but Dovecot, my favorite, implements it and make it fast because it has a good indexing function. I did not test, I can't find the correct syntax for that IMAP command=E2=80= =A6 =2D-=20 Julien Danjou // =E1=90=B0 http://julien.danjou.info --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkyY58UACgkQpGK1HsL+5c3njwCgjSFpE6TYqT8hn2Yy23sM1YJT AdUAnA6GNxlZUu0veLvVOMG2g+N1UP6R =rBEZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--