From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70533 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:26:04 +0200 Organization: m Message-ID: <87zkvw9k5v.fsf@nemi.mork.no> References: <87pqwslybb.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283707589 30957 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2010 17:26:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 17:26:29 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18908@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Sep 05 19:26:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsIz5-0005CQ-O4 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:26:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OsIyx-0004ZX-UJ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:26:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OsIyw-0004ZJ-PN for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:26:18 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OsIys-0001cS-IR for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:26:18 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OsIyr-0002rf-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:26:13 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OsIyq-000562-Uw for ding@gnus.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:26:12 +0200 Original-Received: from nemi.mork.no ([148.122.252.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:26:12 +0200 Original-Received: from bjorn by nemi.mork.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:26:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nemi.mork.no User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lEBVzfarB6VOfvb3NbKsYIUyS3w= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70533 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Ted Zlatanov writes: > >> I may be forgetting something, but basically you need >> >> 1) the nnimap-split-rule for your server >> 2) the split-inbox "INBOX" >> 3) the actual split rules >> >> and the rest is automatic. I prefer this setup to server-side splitting >> because of my gnus-registry and spam-split needs. > > So nnimap pulls down the all the messages from the INBOX folder, applies > the splitting rules, and then moves the messages to the other folders on > the IMAP server, creating the folders if they don't exist? That sounds > like something that can be made faster with streaming. :-) Hmm, looks like the nnimap splitting disappeared completely with the latest git pull. Probably faster, but still... Bjørn