From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70359 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.discuss Subject: Re: gnus-single-article-buffer Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:32:22 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87zkw046ft.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87wrs1fe66.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871va9qkq8.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <8762zldwmr.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87sk2pcgxt.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <87k4o1cg9j.fsf@topper.koldfront.dk> <877hjlht32.fsf@sphax.lybrafox.lan> <87lj7zx2gm.fsf@hariville.hurrynot.org> <8762yo5sym.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <871v9c72cy.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283434525 17268 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2010 13:35:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: gmane-discuss@hawk.netfonds.no To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18743@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 02 15:35:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9wo-0002Qf-RY for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:35:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9wh-0000Qx-1N; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:35:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9wf-0000Qk-LT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:35:13 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9wb-0003lV-M7 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:35:13 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Or9wa-0005Qw-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:35:08 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Or9wV-0002At-N8 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:35:03 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:35:03 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:35:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hcu7dFLshqXHNsBE658Ir6djppc= X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70359 gmane.discuss:13512 Archived-At: On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:41:32 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Why do we need it at all? Is there anyone that wants it t? LMI> It's been the default behaviour for 30 years, so I would guess that LMI> somebody would miss it. I'm willing to put up with user complaints (resolving bugs, finding workarounds, etc.) if it simplifies and improves the code. But maybe we should keep it nil for a year, mark it deprecated, and see who complains. Ted