From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64351
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: epg and expired recipient keys
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:31:22 +0100
Message-ID: <87zm71f0sl.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
References: <x61wkh6n8i.fsf@aix.cs.uni-magdeburg.de>
	<87649ro899.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
	<smutzxbtsam.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu>
	<87y7mlgl9f.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
	<56d409a7-d8c0-4e74-be44-824f942fd4e5@well-done.deisui.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172500639 30038 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 14:37:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:37:19 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Daiki Ueno <ueno@unixuser.org>
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M12875@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Feb 26 15:37:11 2007
Return-path: <ding-owner+M12875@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HLgyT-0001rj-Ev
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:37:09 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M12875@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1HLgwp-0002vb-SF; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:35:27 -0600
Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <wk@gnupg.org>)
	id 1HLgwo-0002vM-Ke
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:35:26 -0600
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <wk@gnupg.org>)
	id 1HLgwi-0006wS-It
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:35:26 -0600
Original-Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com ([217.69.77.222])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1HLgwh-0004Z4-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:35:19 +0100
Original-Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian))
	id 1HLh4s-0004mh-D3
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:43:46 +0100
Original-Received: from wk by localhost with local (Exim 4.62 #1 (Debian))
	id 1HLgss-0003Bk-Au; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:31:22 +0100
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
OpenPGP: id=5B0358A2; url=finger:wk@g10code.com
In-Reply-To: <56d409a7-d8c0-4e74-be44-824f942fd4e5@well-done.deisui.org>
	(Daiki Ueno's message of "Mon\, 26 Feb 2007 21\:49\:33 +0900")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6)
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:64351
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/64351>

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:49, ueno@unixuser.org said:

> I'm now wondering whether to exclude unusable keys from the key list

Yes, please do this when encrypting.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner